Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jul 11, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 15, 2026 - Sep 9, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Treatment Burden in the Digital Era: A Qualitative Case Study of a Digital Care Pathway for Epilepsy

  • Manria Sinervä; 
  • Johanna Annunen; 
  • Fan Wang; 
  • Tiia Yrttiaho; 
  • Olli Korhonen; 
  • Päivi Vieira; 
  • Jonna Komulainen-Ebrahim; 
  • Woubshet Behutiye; 
  • Johanna Uusimaa; 
  • Minna Isomursu

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital care pathways are increasingly used to support chronic disease management, yet empirical evidence of their impact on treatment burden remains scarce.

Objective:

This study examines how a digital care pathway for epilepsy (DCPE) influences treatment burden and what are its effects on daily lives of persons with epilepsy

Methods:

A qualitative single-case study was conducted in a Finnish healthcare setting. Semistructured interviews were carried out with persons with epilepsy (n=18), caregivers(n=3), and healthcare professionals (n=7). Data were analyzed deductively using the Burden of Treatment Theory, focusing on care-related work, challenges, and impacts on well-being.

Results:

DCPE was perceived as convenient, easy to use, timesaving, and reducing treatment burden for most users. It was particularly suitable for routine communication once care relationship had been established, while face-to-face interactions remained important for newly diagnosed or in treatment change. DCPE supported routine medication management well. However, it did not address broader psychosocial impacts of epilepsy, and further development needs were identified.

Conclusions:

DCPE can reduce treatment burden and improve access to care for most users, particularly in routine care. However, hybrid care models remain essential, as face-toface support was preferred in certain phases of care pathway. Future development should focus on the diverse needs of people with epilepsy and on addressing the psychosocial aspects of living with epilepsy.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sinervä M, Annunen J, Wang F, Yrttiaho T, Korhonen O, Vieira P, Komulainen-Ebrahim J, Behutiye W, Uusimaa J, Isomursu M

Treatment Burden in the Digital Era: A Qualitative Case Study of a Digital Care Pathway for Epilepsy

JMIR Preprints. 11/07/2026:106773

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.106773

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/106773

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.