Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Jul 16, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 17, 2026 - Sep 11, 2026
(currently open for review)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Exploring the Interplay of Facility Governance, Sociodemographic Factors, and Structural Readiness in Digital Health Adoption for Maternal and Child Health: Insights from a Qualitative Study in Tertiary and Primary Care Facilities in Manila, Philippines
ABSTRACT
Background:
Digital health has the potential to improve maternal and child health (MCH), particularly during the first 1,000 days of life. However, its successful implementation and adoption depend not only on the availability of technology but also on organizational readiness, governance, and the broader sociotechnical context. Evidence on how these factors interact in low- and low-middle income settings remains limited.
Objective:
This study examined the interplay of sociodemographic context, facility governance, and ICT readiness in shaping the adoption of a digital health tool for MCH in Manila, Philippines.
Methods:
A qualitative descriptive study underpinned by a constructivist paradigm was conducted in Manila, Philippines. The study sites included two outpatient departments in the Philippine General Hospital (PGH) and government primary healthcare facilities. Participants were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through a desk review, facility observations, and semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Qualitative data were analyzed using a two-phase approach combining rapid qualitative analysis and reflexive thematic analysis, guided by the Network of Influence Framework.
Results:
Readiness for digital health adoption was shaped by the interaction of favorable user-level factors and persistent organizational and governance constraints. Manila demonstrated high levels of digital engagement, with widespread smartphone ownership and internet access among potential users. However, fragmented health information systems and limited interoperability continue to constrain digital transformation across healthcare facilities. Six themes emerged from the qualitative analysis. Barriers included limited internet connectivity, inadequate availability of digital devices, usability challenges, and the lack of localized and integrated digital health tools. Enablers included interoperability across health information systems and positive attitudes toward technology adoption among mothers and healthcare providers. Although participants expressed strong willingness to adopt digital health innovations, structural and governance constraints limited their routine implementation. Overall, the findings indicate that the study sites currently exhibit more barriers than enablers, reflecting an imbalance in readiness to support the implementation of the Kalinga application. These findings provide important considerations for prioritizing context-responsive features and developing implementation strategies to address identified readiness gaps.
Conclusions:
Despite high levels of digital engagement among potential end users, structural and governance factors continue to impede digital health adoption for MCH in Manila. Bridging the gap between user readiness and system capacity requires investments in digital infrastructure, interoperability, localized digital solutions, and integrated health information systems.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.