Currently submitted to: Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
Date Submitted: Jul 8, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 9, 2026 - Sep 3, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Exploring Patients’ Perception of Integrating an AI-Powered Clinical Intelligence Companion in a Resource-Constrained Setting: A Cross-Sectional Multi-Centre Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered conversational agents into healthcare has steadily progressed towards real-world deployment, despite limited patient-level evidence regarding acceptability in low-resource settings.
Objective:
This study evaluates patients’ perceptions, acceptance, and concerns regarding the use of an AI-powered Clinical Intelligence Companion-Hami® in outpatient clinics of a resource-constrained setting.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was conducted at four hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. A structured survey comprising demographic information and nine questions to assess perceptions was administered to 8,487 patients after they interacted with Hami®. Frequencies and percentages were reported for all responses, and binary logistic regression was performed to assess factors associated with patients’ acceptance and concerns. Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) were reported with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs), and p-values <.05 were considered significant.
Results:
Patients were highly receptive to Hami®’s integration into healthcare settings (79·9%). Patients attending private hospitals (aOR 1·32; 95% CI: 1·14-1·53), aged 18-44 years (aOR 1·52; 95% CI: 1·29-1·78), and 45-64 years (aOR 1·32; 95% CI: 1·11-1·56) were significantly more likely to prefer Hami®’s integration into clinical care. Patients attending private hospitals also had higher odds of concerns regarding concern of medical errors (aOR 1·29; 95% CI: 1·06 – 1·56), confidentiality breaches (aOR 2·11; 95% CI: 1·57 – 2·82), reduced contact with providers (aOR 1·62; 95% CI: 1·30 – 2·01), decreased human aspects of care (aOR 2·07; 95% CI: 1·65 – 2·61) and unclear accountability (aOR 2·05; 95% CI: 1·58 – 2·65) as compared to patients attending public hospital (P <.05). Educated patients had two times higher odds of concerns regarding reduced contact with providers (aOR 1·91; 95% CI: 1·64 – 2·21) and decreased human aspects of care (aOR 2·10; 95% CI: 1·81 – 2·43) using Hami® in contrast to uneducated patients (P <.05).
Conclusions:
The integration of Hami® in a resource-constrained setting reveals differential readiness for AI-assisted care, with higher acceptance among younger and middle-aged patients and those visiting private hospitals and higher concerns expressed by educated patients and those visiting private hospitals. These findings underscore that patients’ sociodemographics mediate digital health acceptance and that implementation strategies should target educated and private-sector populations, as they are likely more aware of the risks associated with AI integration. By prioritizing transparent communication regarding data privacy and confidentiality, ensuring clinician oversight, and positioning AI as a supportive tool that preserves the essential human interaction, concerns can be mitigated.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.