Currently submitted to: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Date Submitted: Jul 6, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 7, 2026 - Sep 1, 2026
(currently open for review)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Sustaining Public Health Surveillance Systems: A Qualitative Study of Two National Platforms in Thailand
ABSTRACT
Background:
Public health surveillance (PHS) systems are essential for routine disease monitoring, early outbreak detection, and emergency response. Although many studies focus on system development and implementation, less attention has been given to factors that sustain surveillance systems over time.
Objective:
This study aimed to identify factors influencing the sustainability of PHS systems in Thailand by examining stakeholder experiences across two long-standing national surveillance platforms.
Methods:
A qualitative study was conducted using evidence from the malaria surveillance system and the national notifiable disease surveillance system. Semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with stakeholders involved in system development, implementation, operational use, management, and funding. Audio recordings were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results:
Thematic analysis identified seven factors influencing PHS sustainability: user needs, collaboration and partnership, human resources, infrastructure, financial sustainability, ownership, and system adaptability. Sustainability was strengthened when systems fit routine workflows, reduced duplicate work, and produced actionable outputs. The Malaria Surveillance System highlighted the need for context-adapted design in remote settings, while the national notifiable disease surveillance system emphasized interoperability and near real-time national reporting. Key challenges included limited technical capacity, infrastructure maintenance, fragmented lifecycle funding, and unclear operational ownership. Participants also emphasized the importance of moving beyond digitization toward digital transformation that improves efficiency, decision-making, and adaptability.
Conclusions:
Sustaining PHS systems requires more than technical deployment. Long-term viability depends on embedding systems within routine workflows, maintaining human and infrastructure capacity, securing lifecycle financing, establishing clear operational ownership, and enabling continuous adaptation to changing public health and technological needs.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.