Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jul 1, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 2, 2026 - Aug 27, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Citizen Perspectives on Transparency in Communicating about Health Data Use in Research: A Qualitative Study

  • Jean-Frédéric Ménard; 
  • Annabelle Cumyn; 
  • Roxanne Dault; 
  • Emmanuel Bilodeau; 
  • Adrien Barton; 
  • Denis Boutin; 
  • Jean-François Ethier

ABSTRACT

Background:

When citizens and patients are consulted, transparency emerges as a necessity in the context of secondary use of health data in research.

Objective:

We aimed to clarify the types of information that Quebec citizens consider most relevant regarding the use of their health data for research purposes, and to identify effective strategies for communicating this information.

Methods:

Eight focus groups, with a total of 53 members of the public were conducted in Quebec, Canada, in 2025. We paid attention to education levels, language spoken at home, and rural vs urban settings. We assessed which information was deemed necessary, how this information should be shared, and the impact of receiving this information on trust towards research with health data. An inductive/deductive hybrid approach was used to develop the coding framework and analyze the data.

Results:

Three types of individual-targeted information about the secondary use of their health data in research emerged as essential from focus groups: study objectives, data used, and study results. Types of information deemed less desirable included profits, penalties, as well as laws and regulations. Most participants favored receiving information through digital communication methods such as a secured website, but a substantial minority preferred analog methods. Participants’ opinions also converged on a set of expectations regarding the communication of information: accessibility, security, reliability, sustainability, and flexibility.

Conclusions:

The results from this study brought forward a potential transparency model that could be tested to meet public expectations regarding transparency in the setting of secondary use of health data for research as well as a framework for evaluating future proposals.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ménard JF, Cumyn A, Dault R, Bilodeau E, Barton A, Boutin D, Ethier JF

Citizen Perspectives on Transparency in Communicating about Health Data Use in Research: A Qualitative Study

JMIR Preprints. 01/07/2026:106019

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.106019

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/106019

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.