Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jul 2, 2026
Date Accepted: Sep 25, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Implementation and Evaluation of the Stroke Triage App Among Paramedics in Prehospital Emergency Care: Sequential Mixed Methods Study

Kremers F, Hu E, Silkens M, de Ruijter N, van de Wijdeven R, Venema E, Kerkhoff H, Sülz S, Roozenbeek B

Implementation and Evaluation of the Stroke Triage App Among Paramedics in Prehospital Emergency Care: Sequential Mixed Methods Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e105987

DOI: 10.2196/105987

Implementation and Evaluation of the Stroke Triage App among Paramedics in Prehospital Emergency Care: A Sequential Mixed-Method Study

  • Femke Kremers; 
  • Ellen Hu; 
  • Milou Silkens; 
  • Naomi de Ruijter; 
  • Ruben van de Wijdeven; 
  • Esmee Venema; 
  • Henk Kerkhoff; 
  • Sandra Sülz; 
  • Bob Roozenbeek

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital decision-support tools, such as the Stroke Triage App (STA), may enhance prehospital triage and clinical decision-making for suspected stroke patients. However, implementation of decision-support tools and their impact on clinical practice remains insufficiently studied.

Objective:

We aimed to investigate paramedics’ experiences with the implementation of the STA in prehospital practice by evaluating the implementation process, the resulting implementation outcomes, and its impact on clinical workflows.

Methods:

STA implementation was evaluated among paramedics in two emergency medical services regions in the Netherlands using a sequential mixed-methods approach. Actual usage data were extracted from the STA dashboard. Usability, perceived impact, and contextual factors were explored using an online survey and semi-structured interviews.

Results:

Monthly triages ranged from 52 to 153 (median 120, IQR 107–131). Paramedics’ individual STA use ranged from one to 47 times (median 7, IQR 3–13). Out of 246 paramedics with an account, 76 (31%) completed the survey, nine (4%) participated in semi-structured interviews. The STA was generally well accepted, supporting structured neurological assessment and communication. Swift technical support, frequent promotion and use of local ambassadors facilitated STA use. Clinical urgency, poor workflow integration, and limited perceived added value hampered STA use. Users recommended improvements in mobile interface, login features and additional explanation with triage advice.

Conclusions:

This study highlights that, despite barriers in usability and perceived added value, the STA is largely successfully implemented in two ambulance regions in the Netherlands. Initial adoption and sustained use are shaped by usability, workflow integration, and perceived usefulness. These findings underline the importance of addressing contextual and organizational factors when implementing digital decision-support tools in emergency care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kremers F, Hu E, Silkens M, de Ruijter N, van de Wijdeven R, Venema E, Kerkhoff H, Sülz S, Roozenbeek B

Implementation and Evaluation of the Stroke Triage App Among Paramedics in Prehospital Emergency Care: Sequential Mixed Methods Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e105987

DOI: 10.2196/105987

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.