Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jul 1, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 2, 2026 - Aug 27, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Multimodal Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Risk Stratification: A Scoping Review

  • Jesus Alejandro Alzate-Grisales; 
  • Felipe Ocampo Osorio; 
  • Jose Daniel Restrepo Orozco; 
  • Juan Diego Rendon Tabares; 
  • Miguel Perán-Teruel; 
  • Azahar Navarro Beltrán; 
  • Azahar Navarro Beltrán; 
  • Clara Ruiz Torres; 
  • Francisco García-García; 
  • Reinel Tabares-Soto; 
  • Juan M García-Gómez; 
  • Maria de la Iglesia-Vayá

ABSTRACT

Background:

Multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) may improve clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection and risk stratification by integrating imaging, histopathology, molecular, radiomic, and structured clinical data.

Objective:

This scoping review mapped recent evidence on multimodal AI for prostate cancer diagnosis, staging, prognosis, and treatment personalisation, with emphasis on data modalities, fusion strategies, validation, reproducibility, and clinical translation.

Methods:

A PRISMA-ScR-guided search of IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and SpringerLink identified English-language peer-reviewed studies published from January 2021 to December 2025. Eligible studies applied AI to at least two data sources for prostate cancer detection, grading, staging, prognosis, recurrence prediction, or treatment selection. Two reviewers screened records and charted clinical task, modalities, fusion strategy, validation design, performance, and reproducibility indicators.

Results:

Twenty-six studies were included. Clinical variables were incorporated in 24 studies, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in 18, and whole-slide histopathology in six. Multimodal models usually outperformed unimodal baselines in paired comparisons, including PI-CAI performance above the median radiologist AUROC (0.91 vs 0.86) and trimodal PET/MRI/clinical models reporting AUC values up to 0.955. Evidence was limited by retrospective designs, small cohorts, geographic concentration, scarce public code, inconsistent calibration reporting, and no prospective workflow validation.

Conclusions:

Multimodal AI is promising for biopsy triage, grading, staging, prognostication, and treatment selection, but current evidence supports research prioritisation rather than routine deployment. Prospective, diverse, transparent, and clinically embedded validation is required before multimodal AI can guide routine prostate cancer decisions.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Alzate-Grisales JA, Ocampo Osorio F, Restrepo Orozco JD, Rendon Tabares JD, Perán-Teruel M, Navarro Beltrán A, Navarro Beltrán A, Ruiz Torres C, García-García F, Tabares-Soto R, García-Gómez JM, de la Iglesia-Vayá M

Multimodal Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Risk Stratification: A Scoping Review

JMIR Preprints. 01/07/2026:105912

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.105912

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/105912

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.