Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)

Date Submitted: Jun 30, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 8, 2026 - Sep 2, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Impact of Augmented Reality on Re-Training in Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy

  • Tim Jakobi; 
  • Stephanie Schwenke; 
  • Alexander Arendt; 
  • Jovana Petrovic Vorkapic; 
  • Steffen Uthoff; 
  • Robert Pohlmeier; 
  • Thore Reitz

ABSTRACT

Background:

Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy (CKRT) is a complex ICU treatment requiring significant expertise, but training is often time-limited, lacks hands-on practice, and long gaps between training and device use can lead to skill degradation. ICU challenges such as staff shortages and high turnover further hinder proficiency. Augmented reality (AR) offers a promising solution by providing realistic, flexible, and standardized training within clinical settings.

Objective:

This study evaluated the impact of AR-based re-training for a commercial CKRT device on nurse performance, confidence, stress levels, and acceptance in the ICU.

Methods:

The study included 34 ICU nurses who attended classroom training on CKRT devices, followed by a 2–14-day delay to simulate real-world conditions. Participants were then allocated to AR and non-AR groups; the AR group completed self-guided AR re-training and had a 30-minute delay before testing, while the non-AR group did the testing without such re-training. Task performance for device setup and troubleshooting (completion rates, errors, and time on task) was measured during testing, while perceived confidence, stress, and AR learning experience were assessed through structured questionnaires.

Results:

The AR group outperformed the non-AR group in task completion for device setup (94% vs. 88%) and troubleshooting (69% vs. 6%), with fewer errors on average (setup: 1.6 vs. 3.9, troubleshooting: 0.6 vs. 4.5) and faster median setup time. Confidence in device setup declined post-decay in both groups (AR: 59%, non-AR: 41%) but fully recovered in the AR group after re-training (76% "rather confident," 24% "confident"). Troubleshooting confidence was initially low in both groups, declined further post-decay, but improved in the AR group after re-training (65% "rather confident"). Stress levels were lower in the AR group at baseline but followed a similar trend to confidence and troubleshooting, with a decline post-decay and recovery after AR re-training. AR re-training was rated easy to use by 71% of participants, with 86% expressing interest in future use. Most participants valued flexibility (77% preferred self-scheduling, 59% self-paced learning) and emphasized the importance of standardized training content (73%).

Conclusions:

AR re-training showed potential to improve nurse performance, particularly for complex tasks like troubleshooting. Its ability to support procedure rehearsal may also enhance confidence and reduce stress levels.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jakobi T, Schwenke S, Arendt A, Petrovic Vorkapic J, Uthoff S, Pohlmeier R, Reitz T

Impact of Augmented Reality on Re-Training in Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy

JMIR Preprints. 30/06/2026:105902

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.105902

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/105902

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.