Currently submitted to: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
Date Submitted: Jun 26, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 8, 2026 - Sep 2, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Physiotherapists Experience With and View on Digital Health Technologies; a Qualitative Study From Norway
ABSTRACT
Background:
As the world's population ages and a shortage of health care personnel looms, digital health technologies, such as remote patient monitoring, are proposed as a potential solution.
Objective:
This study seeks to explore the factors that influence physiotherapists' views on digital health technologies, such as remote patient monitoring.
Methods:
9 semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 7 physiotherapists and 2 healthcare leaders. The participants are employed in a large Norwegian municipality and are engaged in a project to implement remote patient monitoring as a service. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using Systematic Text Condensation.
Results:
Two main themes were identified: 1) Organization and external factors, and 2) The physiotherapist and internal factors. The external factors included collaboration, task shifting, and leadership. The internal factors were connected to the physiotherapist's core competencies, attitudes, and professional identity.
Conclusions:
Physiotherapists largely view their competencies in digital health technologies as high, although they are cautious about participating in remote patient monitoring projects and do not clearly see their role. Their views on this type of project are influenced by their workplace organization, interprofessional team collaboration, and relationships with their leader. The physiotherapists highlight the therapeutic alliance with patients as a potential concern amid increased digitalization. On the other hand, they have high expectations for digitalization, linked to training and exercise, to increase patient adherence. Moving forward, the healthcare system should reconsider how to implement task shifting through digital health technologies to involve physiotherapists and achieve more sustainable service delivery.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.