Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Jun 22, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 23, 2026 - Aug 18, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
User-Centered Design and Usability Evaluation of a Mobile Research App for Youth Mental Health Data Collection: Mixed Methods Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Mobile research apps are increasingly used in mental health studies to enable multimodal data collection, including self-report, passive smartphone data, and digital behavioral assessments. However, ensuring usability and sustained engagement remains a challenge. User expectations, shaped by commercial apps, often conflict with research constraints, making it difficult to design research-driven apps that balance usability with scientific rigor. Applying user-centered design (UCD) principles can help address these challenges, but their role in optimizing research apps, especially those used in studies involving varied data protocols, requires further evaluation.
Objective:
This study aimed to document the UCD process used in developing a mobile research app for young people’s mental health (the UPIC app), assess its usability post-implementation, and provide insights for future research app developers and study designers.
Methods:
A UCD approach was applied, involving a series of design workshops with young people aged 15–29 to co-design the app’s interface, including early drafts of visual layout and wording. Iterative design modifications were made based on participant feedback. Following development, a usability test was conducted with 10 participants using iOS and Android devices. Participants completed task-based usability evaluations while using the think-aloud method, followed by semi-structured interviews, and the User Experience Plus (UEQ+) questionnaire. Qualitative data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis; quantitative data focused on task performance metrics and user experience scores.
Results:
User involvement contributed to improvements in interface aesthetics, navigation, accessibility, and clarity of wording. Usability testing identified remaining issues related to system feedback, survey tracking, and interaction clarity. Some user- suggested features, such as enhanced survey progress tracking and engagement elements, were only partially implemented due to feasibility constraints and concerns about data integrity. Participants evaluated the app positively in terms of trustworthiness and ease of learning, as reflected in UEQ+ scores, while ratings for engagement and novelty were lower.
Conclusions:
While UCD improved interface usability, findings highlight the importance of combining user involvement with early, real-world usability testing to identify persistent issues. Balancing usability best practices with research constraints requires transparent communication of study design, ethical engagement strategies, and structured usability evaluations. Future research app development studies should integrate iterative UCD to support both user experience and data quality. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov (UU20230127; NCT: NCT06490120)
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.