Currently accepted at: JMIR Medical Education
Date Submitted: Jun 21, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 22, 2026 - Aug 17, 2026
Date Accepted: Aug 24, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
This paper has been accepted and is currently in production.
It will appear shortly on 10.2196/105172
The final accepted version (not copyedited yet) is in this tab.
Toward Human-Centered Pedagogy in the Age of Generative AI: A Qualitative Phenomenological Study of Higher Education Educators
ABSTRACT
Background:
The rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping teaching and learning practices in higher education, creating opportunities for pedagogical innovation while raising new questions about educator roles, agency, and professional judgment. Despite growing interest in AI integration, limited research has explored how educators experience and interpret these pedagogical transformations.
Objective:
This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of higher education educators as they navigate emerging pedagogical practices in AI-mediated teaching environments and to understand how they make sense of changes in their roles, agency, and instructional decision-makin
Methods:
A qualitative phenomenological approach was employed to examine educators’ experiences with AI-enhanced teaching. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with higher education educators from diverse disciplinary backgrounds. Data were analyzed using phenomenological thematic analysis to identify shared meanings and patterns across participants’ experiences.
Results:
The findings revealed that AI is not merely being adopted as a technological tool but is contributing to a broader pedagogical transformation. Educators described shifts from knowledge transmission to learning mediation, from fixed authority to negotiated expertise, and from routine instructional practices to more reflective, creative, and relational forms of teaching. Participants also highlighted persistent tensions related to academic integrity, ethical AI use, overreliance on automated systems, and the preservation of meaningful human connections in educational settings. These experiences reflected ongoing efforts to balance technological innovation with pedagogical and ethical responsibilities.
Conclusions:
The findings suggest that emerging pedagogy in the AI era is a negotiated, relational, and ethically mediated process rather than a purely technological transformation. This study contributes a human-centered conceptualization of AI-enhanced pedagogy that emphasizes educator agency, critical judgment, and the continued importance of human relationships in higher education. The results offer insights for institutions, policymakers, and educators seeking to support responsible and pedagogically meaningful AI integration.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.