Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jun 20, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 22, 2026 - Aug 17, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Eliciting Community Voice in Generative AI Conversational Agent Design for Parent-Child Interaction Therapy Among Low-Income, Hispanic Caregivers: Qualitative Study

  • Jason Jent; 
  • Kevin Y. Malave; 
  • Morgan Darabi; 
  • Annafi Mirza; 
  • Mitsunori Ogihara; 
  • Betty Alonso; 
  • Juliet San Juan; 
  • Eileen Davis; 
  • Cindy Sobalvarro; 
  • Dainelys Garcia

ABSTRACT

Background:

Child disruptive behavior disorders are highly prevalent and disproportionately affect families with limited access to evidence-based treatment. Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is an empirically supported intervention for reducing disruptive behaviors; however, access barriers including cost, transportation, and language remain significant challenges for predominantly low-income, Hispanic families. Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered parenting support holds promise for extending reach of evidence-based interventions; however, conversational agent interventions designed without community input risk low uptake and poor fit among historically marginalized populations which may further compound disparities.

Objective:

This study aimed to examine predominantly low-income, Hispanic caregivers’ perspectives, preferences, and concerns regarding AI-powered conversational agents (chatbots) to support parenting practice related to caregiver-child relationship quality and disruptive behaviors, grounded in PCIT principles.

Methods:

Three focus groups (two Spanish-speaking, one English-speaking) were conducted with predominantly low-income, Hispanic caregivers (N = 31) of children ages 2–7 years with reported disruptive behaviors. Participants were recruited through a community-based organization serving predominantly low-income, Hispanic families in Miami-Dade County. Focus group data were analyzed using a rapid qualitative analysis framework with a structured matrix approach to identify themes across groups.

Results:

Themes related to AI-powered parenting support included technology acceptance, learning preferences and conversational style, trust and safety, personalization and privacy, usability and engagement, and barriers to use. Overall, caregivers expressed high openness to AI-powered parenting support but articulated specific design requirements centered on trust, cultural responsiveness, bilingual access, in-the-moment behavioral coaching, and human oversight for safety-sensitive situations.

Conclusions:

Findings highlight that low-income, Hispanic caregivers are receptive to AI-powered parenting support but require design features that reflect their lived experiences, values, and structural constraints. Actively incorporating community voice throughout the design, development, and evaluation process may be instrumental for creating culturally and linguistically responsive parenting conversational agents that are trusted, engaging, and responsive to the needs of the families they are intended to serve. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jent J, Malave KY, Darabi M, Mirza A, Ogihara M, Alonso B, San Juan J, Davis E, Sobalvarro C, Garcia D

Eliciting Community Voice in Generative AI Conversational Agent Design for Parent-Child Interaction Therapy Among Low-Income, Hispanic Caregivers: Qualitative Study

JMIR Preprints. 20/06/2026:105131

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.105131

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/105131

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.