Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Diabetes

Date Submitted: Jun 22, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 22, 2026 - Aug 17, 2026
Date Accepted: Oct 23, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Clinical Outcomes of Multidisciplinary Remote Patient Monitoring for Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study

Brown C, Karki S, Garla V

Clinical Outcomes of Multidisciplinary Remote Patient Monitoring for Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study

JMIR Diabetes 2026;11:e105115

DOI: 10.2196/105115

PMID: 43002710

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Clinical Outcomes of Multidisciplinary Remote Patient Monitoring for High-Risk Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Carly Brown; 
  • Sachin Karki; 
  • Vishnu Garla

ABSTRACT

Background:

Multidisciplinary remote patient monitoring (RPM) programs may improve diabetes management by enabling continuous glucose monitoring and timely treatment adjustments. Evidence describing real-world implementation of RPM programs in high-risk populations remains limited.

Objective:

This study evaluated clinical outcomes of a multidisciplinary RPM program for patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods:

Adults with T2DM, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) > 7%, and insulin therapy who enrolled in an RPM program at the University of Mississippi Medical Center between July 2020 and December 2022 were included. Patients received a Bluetooth-enabled glucometer and structured follow-up from nurses and pharmacists operating under a collaborative practice agreement. A propensity score–matched control group receiving usual outpatient care was identified. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes included hospitalizations, program engagement, and medication adjustments.

Results:

Among 109 RPM patients, mean HbA1c decreased from 10.79% to 8.85% (−1.94%). Fifty-eight patients completed at least one structured glucose review and were considered active participants; 54 were matched to controls. In the matched cohort, HbA1c decreased by −2.53% among RPM participants compared with −1.97% in controls, although the between-group difference was not statistically significant (p=0.278). Participants who completed the RPM program achieved the largest HbA1c reductions (−3.34%). Hospitalizations occurred in 14.8% of RPM participants versus 18.5% of matched controls.

Conclusions:

Multidisciplinary RPM integrating nurses, pharmacists, and physician oversight was associated with improvements in glycemic control among high-risk T2DM patients. Greater program engagement was associated with larger HbA1c reductions, suggesting RPM may represent a scalable approach to improving diabetes care in medically underserved populations.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Brown C, Karki S, Garla V

Clinical Outcomes of Multidisciplinary Remote Patient Monitoring for Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study

JMIR Diabetes 2026;11:e105115

DOI: 10.2196/105115

PMID: 43002710

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.