Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Jun 18, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 20, 2026 - Aug 15, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Extended Dwell Catheter Use in Pediatrics: a Systematic Review Protocol

  • Olivier Cusson; 
  • Lamia Hayawi; 
  • Stephen A. Kutcher; 
  • Anne Tsampalieros; 
  • Paul Istasy; 
  • Katie O'Hearn; 
  • Dayre McNally

ABSTRACT

Background:

Vascular access is essential in pediatric inpatient care but often challenging due to small vessel size, patient agitation, and poor tolerance for repeated painful procedures. Short peripheral IV catheters (PIVs) are very frequently used, but they frequently fail before treatment completion. Longer peripheral catheters, often referred to as extended dwell catheters (EDCs) which are defined as peripheral catheters of at least 4 cm in length, may provide more stability and longevity while avoiding central venous catheter risks. Evidence in pediatrics is limited and mostly from observational data, with variable definitions and outcomes across studies. No pediatric specific systematic review has synthesized EDC literature. Objectives: The primary objective of this systematic review is to summarize longevity in extended dwell catheter and where possible compare it to other vascular access devices in the pediatric population. The secondary objective is to compare the rate of successful treatment completion through individual extended dwell catheters when compared to standard peripheral venous catheters. As an exploratory objective, we will also describe which other outcomes related to extended dwell catheters have been reported. Methods and analysis: This review will follow the proposed methodological standard of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and CENTRAL electronic will be performed. Eligible studies include prospective and retrospective studies that include children 0-18 years old, hospitalized in any type of pediatric unit, with reported dwell times for inserted EDCs with or without a comparator group. Titles and abstracts screening will be done by crowdsourcing and machine learning, and full-text screening will be done by two reviewers. Included studies risk of bias assessment and data extraction will be performed by at least two independent reviewers. Where possible, a meta-analysis using random effect models will be used to pool the primary and secondary outcomes. Discussion: This systematic review will provide the first comprehensive synthesis of evidence regarding EDCs in pediatrics. By consolidating data from diverse clinical contexts, we aim to generate a clearer understanding of how catheter design and insertion variables influence dwell time and complication risks.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Cusson O, Hayawi L, Kutcher SA, Tsampalieros A, Istasy P, O'Hearn K, McNally D

Extended Dwell Catheter Use in Pediatrics: a Systematic Review Protocol

JMIR Preprints. 18/06/2026:105066

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.105066

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/105066

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.