Previously submitted to: JMIR Medical Education (no longer under consideration since Aug 22, 2026)
Date Submitted: Jun 18, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 22, 2026 - Aug 17, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Toward a Regional Standard: Minimum Competencies in AI for MERCOSUR.
ABSTRACT
Background:
Artificial intelligence (AI), health data science, digital health platforms, clinical decision support systems, and generative language models are increasingly shaping medical practice. Undergraduate medical education in Latin America requires a minimum standard that is feasible, assessable, and sensitive to regional inequalities.
Objective:
To develop an evidence-informed minimum regional AI competency-and-assessment standard for public medical schools in the expanded MERCOSUR region, grounded in a secondary curricular matrix, recent peer-reviewed literature, and international guidance on digital health, AI ethics, clinical validation, and assessment.
Methods:
We conducted a documentary evidence synthesis using a secondary curricular matrix of 131 public medical-school entries from Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, Paraguay, and Bolivia, combined with a targeted narrative synthesis of recent peer-reviewed literature and international guidance on AI education, digital health competencies, ethics, clinical validation, and assessment. Entries without sufficient public documentation were treated as non-codifiable rather than as evidence of absence. Brazilian entries were interpreted separately because their coding was based on national curricular guidelines rather than institution-specific pedagogical projects.
Results:
Of 131 entries, 92 were codifiable and 39 were non-codifiable because of insufficient publicly available curricular documentation. Among codifiable entries, AI/bioinformatics was absent in 91 of 92 entries (98.9%), and AI/technology ethics did not exceed tangential general bioethics. We propose five minimum competencies with SMART-oriented outcomes and multimodal assessment evidence: AI and data literacy; health-data governance and digital systems; critical appraisal and clinical validation; ethics, equity, and accountability; and human-centered AI use, communication, and teamwork.
Conclusions:
The proposed framework is presented as an evidence-informed, regionally adaptable minimum standard requiring subsequent Delphi validation and pilot testing. Its main contribution is to translate documented curricular gaps into measurable outcomes that can be implemented even in low-resource settings without requiring advanced programming for every medical graduate.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.