Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jun 13, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 18, 2026 - Aug 13, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Health Care Students'/Professionals' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence: Survey in Erbil, Iraq

  • Tara Mohammed Ali Shallal

ABSTRACT

Background:

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare systems worldwide and medical schools worldwide have begun integrating AI into their curricula. The healthcare system in Iraq is currently undergoing development and AI has not yet been adopted in clinical practice in Erbil; in addition, no formal AI instruction has been incorporated into the medical education curriculum.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to assess knowledge levels, attitudes, and perceptions regarding AI among medical students and healthcare professionals in Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq.

Methods:

This survey was distributed to medical students and residents in Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. The survey was adapted from Teng et al, and modified to reflect the local context. Convenience sampling was used. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences), Version 26.0. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to test associations between categorical variables. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare mean ranks between groups in the non-normally distributed data. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

A total of 368 participants participated in this study. The majority (85.6%) of participants felt that AI should be taught in schools and universities, and 90.8% reported using AI. ChatGPT was by far the most commonly used AI tool (85.3%). Participants aged 20-24 years (93.2%) and 25-29 years (90.2%) showed the highest prevalence of using AI. Participants that used AI had higher scores for support for AI development in their field (P = 0.001), feelings of hope towards AI in their field (P = 0.004) and thinking that students should learn the basics of AI (P = 0.03). Male participants and those who did not express an interest in starting an independent practice were most likely to use AI (P = 0.045 and P = 0.043, respectively). Participants interested in starting their own independent practice were more likely to think that AI should be taught in schools and universities (P = 0.018). The most common concern regarding AI was loss of jobs (33.0%), followed by overreliance on AI (22.8%). Qualitative findings revealed themes of guarded optimism, and concerns regarding the ethical implications of AI use in medicine.

Conclusions:

Medical students and physicians alike expressed guarded optimism regarding the future of AI in healthcare. In addition, most participants expressed dissatisfaction with their understanding of the ethical implications of AI in healthcare and emphasized the need for formal AI education in healthcare curricula.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shallal TMA

Health Care Students'/Professionals' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence: Survey in Erbil, Iraq

JMIR Preprints. 13/06/2026:104548

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.104548

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/104548

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.