Currently submitted to: Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
Date Submitted: Jun 8, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 22, 2026 - Aug 17, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Digital Interventions in Immunization Programs: A Global Scoping Review of Tools, Outcomes, and Implementation Challenges
ABSTRACT
Background:
Digital health interventions (DHIs) are increasingly being integrated into immunization programs to address persistent challenges such as low vaccine coverage, poor schedule adherence, and rising vaccine hesitancy. However, the evidence on the effectiveness, implementation barriers, and stakeholder-specific outcomes of these interventions remains fragmented. This scoping review aimed to map the types of digital tools used in immunization programs globally, assess their impact on key outcomes coverage, adherence, knowledge, and hesitancy and identify common implementation barriers and enablers.
Objective:
This scoping review aimed to map the types of digital tools used in immunization programs globally, assess their impact on key outcomes coverage, adherence, knowledge, and hesitancy and identify common implementation barriers and enablers.
Methods:
Following the Arksey and O’Malley framework, refined by Levac et al., and guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across seven electronic databases and grey literature sources covering studies published from January 2005 to March 2025. Eligibility criteria included studies focusing on digital health interventions for immunization across all populations and settings, published in English, including randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, mixed-methods studies, and systematic reviews. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, mixed-methods designs, and systematic reviews. Study selection was conducted through title/abstract and full-text screening. Data were charted by digital tool type, stakeholder group, immunization domain, outcomes, and implementation context, using a standardized data charting form
Results:
Fifty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. SMS reminders were the most frequently used and consistently effective tools, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), showing improvements in vaccine uptake and schedule adherence. Electronic Immunization Registries (EIRs), AI chatbots, gamified applications, and decision aids demonstrated varied impact on data quality, knowledge, and vaccine confidence. Implementation success was supported by health system integration, localized messaging, and community trust, while barriers included low digital literacy, infrastructure gaps, and mistrust.
Conclusions:
Digital tools hold significant promise for enhancing immunization programs, particularly when tailored to local contexts and integrated into existing health systems. Further research should prioritize cost-effectiveness, equity, and long-term impact. These findings provide a comprehensive mapping of existing evidence to inform policy, practice, and future research in digital immunization strategies Clinical Trial: -
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.