Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Jun 5, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 6, 2026 - Aug 1, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Understanding Home Fall Risk and Acceptance of AI-enabled Assessment Tools: A Qualitative Descriptive Study

  • Wonkyung Jung; 
  • Jiyoun Song; 
  • Min-Jeoung Kang; 
  • Markar Akopyan; 
  • Dana Zapolin; 
  • Boeun Kim

ABSTRACT

Background:

Falls among older adults are a major public health concern, with many risks arising from environmental conditions within the home. Although home safety assessments are effective, they are often limited by accessibility and scalability. Artificial intelligence (AI)–enabled tools have the potential to support fall risk assessment; however, their successful implementation depends on user acceptance and alignment with the needs of older adults, caregivers, and health care providers.

Objective:

This study aimed to explore perceptions of home fall risk and examine the acceptability of AI-enabled fall risk assessment tools among older adults, informal caregivers, and health care providers.

Methods:

A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using inductive thematic analysis. Participants were recruited through online platforms and snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 participants (8 older adults, 4 caregivers, 9 providers) to explore experiences with fall-related home environments, perceptions of fall risk, and views on AI-enabled assessment tools.

Results:

Three interrelated themes emerged regarding home fall-risk experiences and AI acceptance: 1) Fall risk was embedded within everyday home environments, where hazards such as clutter, poor lighting, and layout were often normalized within daily routines rather than perceived as modifiable risks. 2) Fall prevention was characterized as an ongoing negotiation between independence and safety, with older adults prioritizing autonomy while caregivers and providers emphasized risk reduction. 3) Participants expressed openness to AI-enabled tools; however, acceptance was conditional and dependent on perceived usefulness, ease of use, accuracy, and alignment with daily needs. Concerns regarding privacy, reliability, and the ability of AI to capture contextual factors were prominent. Participants emphasized that AI should complement, rather than replace, human caregiving and clinical judgment.

Conclusions:

Successful implementation will require balancing safety with autonomy, integrating tools into existing care practices, and fostering trust through transparency, usability, and human oversight. These insights provide important guidance for the development and implementation of scalable, AI-enabled fall prevention strategies to support aging in place. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jung W, Song J, Kang MJ, Akopyan M, Zapolin D, Kim B

Understanding Home Fall Risk and Acceptance of AI-enabled Assessment Tools: A Qualitative Descriptive Study

JMIR Preprints. 05/06/2026:103784

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.103784

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/103784

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.