Currently submitted to: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
Date Submitted: Jun 5, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 23, 2026 - Aug 18, 2026
(currently open for review)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
The Use of a Soft Exoskeletal Robotic in Hand Motor Impairment Reduction in Chronic Stroke: A Real-World Analysis
ABSTRACT
Background:
Stroke remains a leading cause of disability worldwide, with upper extremity (UE) impairment reported in over 60% of stroke survivors chronically. High intensity UE therapy has been shown to support restoration of function and optimized UE motor control post stroke. Exoskeletal robotics have emerged as a meaningful tool to facilitate quality, high intensity UE rehabilitation.
Objective:
This present work seeks to evaluate the use of a soft exoskeletal robotic in UE therapy with the Bioliberty Lifeglov (Edinburgh, UK), to optimize rehabilitation for patients with chronic stroke.
Methods:
Patients with stroke (>3 months) over the age of 18 seen at the Abilities Research Center were included in this analysis. Patients used the Lifeglov soft exoskeletal robotic and Lifehub rehabilitation software between September 2024-December 2025 in UE therapy. Lifeglov includes a soft exoskeleton liner, an actuator that inflates to facilitate flexion/extension of the digits, and a connecting splint. Lifehub activities included a passive range of motion mode, active assisted range of motion strength training exercises, and gamified therapy using the exoskeleton as a controller in exergames targeting grip, gross digit flexion/extension, and motor planning. Patients received 60 minutes of therapy, 3 times per week, for 8 weeks. Patients were assessed at baseline and discharge including upper limb function (Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment [FMA-UE], Action Research Arm Test [ARAT], grip strength) functional recovery (NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS]), spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale [MAS]), and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Descriptive statistics and non-parametric statistics (Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests) were used to evaluate functional and behavioral outcomes.
Results:
Twenty-eight patients were included in this analysis At the group level, patients showed statistically significant functional upper extremity improvements, including gains in total ARAT score (mean difference 2.61, p=0.005), with significant improvements in grasp (0.82, p=0.02), pinch (0.82, p=0.02), and gross movement (0.46, p=0.019), as well as reductions in spasticity on the MAS for total score (-0.62, p=0.05), finger extension (-0.36, p=0.01), and elbow extension (-0.25, p=0.02). Grip strength showed a non-significant improvement (mean 3.2 kg, p>0.05), and the FMA-UE showed no significant motor or non-motor changes across subscales. Quality of life measures trended positively, with a mean NIHSS reduction of -0.29 (42.9% of patients improving), and EQ-5D-5L improvements in mobility (96.6% to 82.8%), self-care (79.3% to 67.9%), pain/discomfort (79.3% to 75%), and anxiety/depression (67.9% to 55.6%), with a mean utility score improvement of 0.048, though none reached statistical significance, and social participation remained unchanged (mean difference t-score 0.33).
Conclusions:
The use of a soft exoskeletal robotic paired with bespoke digital therapy interventions facilitates meaningful improvements in UE and hand function and spasticity in chronic stroke survivors. translating to improved quality of life and reduction in functional impairment. .
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.