Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Jun 8, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 9, 2026 - Aug 4, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Technophilia in Later Life: Longitudinal Associations with Digital Engagement Among Older Adults in Sweden

  • Joakim Niklasson; 
  • Johannes Malm; 
  • Johan Sanmartin Berglund; 
  • Peter Anderberg

ABSTRACT

Background:

Rapid digitalization of Swedish public and health services has made active participation contingent on both access to and confidence with digital tools. Older adults’ attitudes toward technology, captured by the construct of technophilia, are a key dimension of digital inclusion that complements, but is not reducible to, observed access or use. Longitudinal within-person evidence on how these attitudes evolve, and on which correlates shape them, has been limited.

Objective:

To estimate within-person change in technophilia among community-dwelling older adults in southern Sweden between 2019 and 2023, and to quantify the relative contribution of sociodemographic, health, wellbeing, and digital-engagement factors to the variance in technophilia

Methods:

We analyzed three waves (2019, 2021, 2023) of the SNAC-IT data collection from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care, Blekinge. The analytic sample comprised 1,398 person-waves from 618 individuals aged 60 years and older with observed TechPH scores. Covariate missingness was handled with multiple imputation. Associations were estimated using a linear mixed-effects model with a random intercept for participant, with survey wave as the time indicator and five pre-specified covariate domains entered sequentially.

Results:

Within-person TechPH declined modestly between 2019 and 2023 (P < .001), corresponding to approximately 11% lower scores by 2023, even though population-level means remained essentially flat (2.83 → 2.81). Four of five covariate domains contributed significant incremental variance; three dominated: Internet Use and Digital Activity (ΔR² = 0.14), Sociodemographic (ΔR² = 0.12), and Digital Health Service Use (ΔR² = 0.09; all P < .001). The Wellbeing and Life Events domain also reached significance (ΔR² = 0.03, P < .001), while Health and Functioning contributed negligibly (ΔR² = 0.01, P = .14). The model explained 40% of the variance (R² = 0.40); an ICC of 0.44 indicated that nearly half of residual variance reflected stable individual differences in technophilia.

Conclusions:

In an ageing Swedish cohort, within-person technophilia declined modestly across five years even as population-level digital uptake rose. The strongest correlates of technophilia were concrete digital behaviors, not demographic categories or clinical health, suggesting that policies and evaluations aimed at digital inclusion should track attitudinal measures in addition to access and use statistics Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Niklasson J, Malm J, Sanmartin Berglund J, Anderberg P

Technophilia in Later Life: Longitudinal Associations with Digital Engagement Among Older Adults in Sweden

JMIR Preprints. 08/06/2026:103580

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.103580

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/103580

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.