Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jun 2, 2026

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Digital screening for postnatal depression in fathers and non-gestational parents: a mixed methods feasibility study.

  • Jessica Raphael; 
  • Anja Wittkowski; 
  • Emily Eisner

ABSTRACT

Background:

Despite its prevalence (9%) in fathers, there is no routine screening for postnatal depression (PND) in fathers and non-gestational parents.

Objective:

Therefore, the current study aimed to test the feasibility, acceptability, validity and safety of a smartphone app to screen for PND in this group.

Methods:

In this single-arm, mixed-methods cohort study fathers and non-gestational parents whose partners were ≥36 weeks pregnant were recruited from National Health Service (NHS) antenatal services. Participants completed baseline assessments exploring demographics, depression, anxiety and quality of life. Participants were then asked to use the CareLoop PND app daily to screen for depression until eight weeks postpartum. Follow-up assessments at eight weeks postpartum explored app acceptability, health service use, quality of life, depression, anxiety, suicidality and postpartum bonding. All participants were invited for an interview to explore app and study feasibility and acceptability. Data were analysed using framework analysis.

Results:

Of the 12 participants recruited at baseline, one was withdrawn, while the remaining used the app until eight weeks postpartum. Ten completed the eight-week follow-up questionnaires, and nine took part in the qualitative interview. A priori “accept” criteria of overall completion rate of app assessments was met; 49% of daily app-based Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) assessments were completed, with 64% of participants completing more than half of daily EPDS. Frequency of app use declined over the 12-week app use period; participant characteristics (demographics or method of study referral) did not predict app use over time. The app positively screened one participant for postnatal depression who was referred to their GP and subsequently referred by the GP for psychological intervention. Interview and questionnaire data indicated most participants found the app acceptable to use, although some suggested improvements.

Conclusions:

The findings indicated it was feasible and acceptable for fathers and non-gestational parents to utilise an app for PND screening. Qualitative findings highlighted the importance of overcoming negative societal views of fathers and non-gestational parents with PND, acknowledging their valuable role throughout the perinatal period, and ensuring appropriate mental health support is available. Recommendations are made to refine the app for utilisation with fathers and non-gestational parents.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Raphael J, Wittkowski A, Eisner E

Digital screening for postnatal depression in fathers and non-gestational parents: a mixed methods feasibility study.

JMIR Preprints. 02/06/2026:103407

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.103407

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/103407

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.