Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Jun 2, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 3, 2026 - Jul 29, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Digital Health Interventions for Physical Function and Activity in Frail Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Bo Liu; 
  • Yu-Hsiang Hou; 
  • Wei-Chih Lien; 
  • Yang-Cheng Lin; 
  • Lenka Lhotská; 
  • Josef Černohorský; 
  • Jun-Neng Roan; 
  • Vendula Macháčková

ABSTRACT

Background:

Frailty affects more than 20% of older adults and increases falls, disability, and health care use. Traditional rehabilitation is limited by accessibility barriers. Interactive digital health interventions (DHIs), particularly mobile health (mHealth) programs integrating wearable activity trackers with behavioral coaching, may offer scalable alternatives.

Objective:

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of interactive DHIs compared with conventional rehabilitation for physical function and physical activity in older adults with frailty or prefrailty, and whether intervention modality and behavioral coaching components influence outcomes.

Methods:

The authors searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Airiti, CNKI, and WanFang through August 31, 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults aged ≥65 years with frailty or prefrailty. Primary outcomes included grip strength, Timed Up and Go (TUG), gait speed, and the Fried Frailty Index; secondary outcomes were moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and step count. Duplicate records were identified and removed automatically using PICO Portal (Evidence Partners). All subsequent screening of titles, abstracts, and full-text articles was performed manually by two independent reviewers without the use of automated eligibility tools; disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (RoB 2); certainty of evidence was rated using GRADE. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed with prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

Results:

Nine RCTs (358 participants) were included. Pooling all trials, DHIs showed no clear superiority over conventional rehabilitation for primary functional outcomes, with low to very low certainty of evidence. DHIs produced a robust, clinically important increase in MVPA of 14.31 minutes per valid day (95% CI 12.45–16.16; 2 trials; I2 = 0%). Sensitivity analyses excluding high risk-of-bias trials revealed clinically meaningful improvements in gait speed (mean difference [MD] 0.11 m/s), Fried Frailty Index (MD −1.00 points), and daily step count (approximately 480 additional steps). Modality-based subgroup analyses showed that mHealth programs incorporating behavioral coaching achieved superior improvements in grip strength (MD 2.90 kgf) and TUG (MD −6.57 seconds, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference) compared with exergame-based interventions. Findings for the Fried Frailty Index, MVPA, and step count should be interpreted with caution, as each was informed by only two trials (73 participants total).

Conclusions:

DHIs may increase MVPA and may improve selected functional outcomes, including gait speed and frailty status, when implemented with sufficient fidelity, but the certainty of evidence remains low to very low. mHealth interventions integrating wearable activity tracking and behavioral coaching appear more promising than stand- alone exergames, although confirmatory trials are needed before firm clinical prioritization. Future trials should evaluate long-term outcomes, economic impacts, and implementation fidelity. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO registration number CRD42023462594; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023462594


 Citation

Please cite as:

Liu B, Hou YH, Lien WC, Lin YC, Lhotská L, Černohorský J, Roan JN, Macháčková V

Digital Health Interventions for Physical Function and Activity in Frail Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

JMIR Preprints. 02/06/2026:103304

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.103304

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/103304

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.