Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Human Factors (no longer under consideration since Dec 12, 2020)

Date Submitted: Mar 2, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 3, 2018 - Mar 17, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Variability in Electronic Health Record Use for Medication Management in Primary Care

  • Enid Montague

Background: Traditional medication management complexity now combined with EHR systems, which are still novel in primary care settings, propose new challenges in trying to improve physician workflow. Objective: The purpose of this study was to understand how workflow variability in medication management using an electronic health record (EHR) system is related to patient and physician factors. Methods: Two different patient cases (chronic vs. acute condition) were presented to participants in a controlled environment. A task action coding scheme was used to analyze the videotaped data from the physician’s EHR usage. A usability survey was administered after the task. Results: High variability in the medication review process and EHR perceptions were revealed. Patient conditions and physicians’ EHR perceptions were related to the found variability in the workflow. Conclusions: Interventions designed to improve EHR medication management in primary care should consider alignment with physician’s varied workflow linked with their perceptions and differing patient condition.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Montague E

Variability in Electronic Health Record Use for Medication Management in Primary Care

JMIR Preprints. 02/03/2018:10289

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.10289

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/10289

The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.