Currently submitted to: JMIR AI
Date Submitted: May 29, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 17, 2026 - Aug 12, 2026
(currently open for review)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Integrating Social Cognitive Theory and Bowlby's Attachment Theory to Explore the Algorithmic Risk of Suicide and Psychosis in the Age of Conversational AI: A Viewpoint Study
ABSTRACT
Public health concerns are rising in the era where an artificial intelligence-mediated environment is increasingly shaping adolescents' cognitions, emotions, and behavior. It also affects self-concept, affect regulation capacity, and reality testing. There is an increase of artificial intelligence (AI) in the social and clinical ecosystem that is demanding a rigorous examination of its intersection with mental health outcomes, especially with suicide and psychosis risk. This narrative review explores the emergent evidence with foundational psychological theories of learning and attachment, which are Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and Bowlby’s attachment theory, with a key focus on parasocial relationships with AI systems to understand how conversational AI companions may influence suicidal ideations and psychotic experiences. The paper argues that AI systems operate as potent observational learning environments and as pseudo-attachment figures that may reshape one's cognition, affect, and behaviors, especially for vulnerable groups. From an attachment perspective, the paper examines anthropomorphism, parasocial bonds, and pseudo-secure attachment to AI companions amongst adolescents with insecure attachment styles and mental health vulnerability. Synthesizing the framework to propose design LLMs with theory-driven lexicons, multi-task models sensitive to attachment signals, and safety architectures that modulate users' narratives. By situating the algorithm risk within existing literature, this review offers a psychologically driven conceptual framework to guide whom, how, and under what conditions conversational AI may increase or decrease vulnerability to suicide and psychosis.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.