Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: May 29, 2026
Date Accepted: Oct 23, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Integrating Large Language Models Into Patient Health Education: Interview Study Among Nurses

Tang X, Zhang Q, Xu S, Hong Q, Kan Z, Gao Y, Du Y, Zhao Y, Xu D, Liu G, Zhang H, Zhao J, Song Z, Wan P, Jiang E, Xie W

Integrating Large Language Models Into Patient Health Education: Interview Study Among Nurses

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e102846

DOI: 10.2196/102846

PMID: 43019552

Integrating Large Language Models Into Patient Health Education: Interview Study Among Nurses

  • Xiaoqing Tang; 
  • Qianqian Zhang; 
  • Sulin Xu; 
  • Qiyang Hong; 
  • Zhongfan Kan; 
  • Yiming Gao; 
  • Yuebing Du; 
  • Yujie Zhao; 
  • Dan Xu; 
  • Guiying Liu; 
  • Huijuan Zhang; 
  • Jinying Zhao; 
  • Zhen Song; 
  • Peixing Wan; 
  • Erlie Jiang; 
  • Wenjun Xie

ABSTRACT

Background:

Large language models(LLMs)are increasingly used to support patient health education. However, little is known about how frontline nurses, who deliver most patient education, experience these tools in clinical practice or what benefits and risks emerge from their use.

Objective:

To explore frontline nurses’ experiences of using LLM-assisted patient education and examine the practical tensions and implementation challenges associated with human–LLM collaborative health education.

Methods:

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 hematological nurses (from December 2025 to March 2026) regarding their human-machine collaborative practices. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis, with two researchers independently coding the data and reaching consensus through discussion.

Results:

Nurses’ experiences were characterized by three major tensions. First, LLMs improved efficiency and content standardization but raised safety concerns and oversight burden, as nurses remained responsible for guiding, reviewing, and correcting LLM generated content. Second, LLMs use simultaneously supported professional learning while increasing perceived responsibility and competence demands. Third, patients benefited from specialized information but faced barriers including low health literacy and technological unfamiliarity. Across these tensions, nurses’ value lay not merely in using LLMs, but in safely integrating them into clinical workflows while managing risks and maintaining accountability.

Conclusions:

LLMs can improve the efficiency and accessibility of patient health education, benefiting both nurses and patients. However, their use also introduces practical tensions related to safety, professional responsibility, and patient applicability. Future implementation and design of these models should better support nurse oversight, support contextual adaptation, and promote patient-centered care. What is already known? Clinical Trial: Trial Registration: ChiCTR2500107909


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tang X, Zhang Q, Xu S, Hong Q, Kan Z, Gao Y, Du Y, Zhao Y, Xu D, Liu G, Zhang H, Zhao J, Song Z, Wan P, Jiang E, Xie W

Integrating Large Language Models Into Patient Health Education: Interview Study Among Nurses

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e102846

DOI: 10.2196/102846

PMID: 43019552

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.