Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: May 30, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 17, 2026 - Aug 12, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Development, Content Validation, and Pilot Testing of a Digital Maturity Assessment Questionnaire for Integrated Healthcare Systems

  • Manuel Abreu; 
  • Teresa Magalhães; 
  • Joana Seringa; 
  • Janine Faria; 
  • Leandro Panitz; 
  • Paulo Vilas Boas

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital transformation in the healthcare sector plays a crucial role in improving operational efficiency, patient safety, and the quality of services provided. So, the measurement and assessment of digital transformation is primordial, for the evolution of any health care service. Around the world there are some instruments that already do this, but in Portugal there is none that is suited for the Portuguese context and that will assess the digital maturity of Integrated Healthcare Systems.

Objective:

This study aimed to validate a questionnaire for assessing the digital maturity of Integrated Healthcare Systems, ensuring its reliability and suitability for the Portuguese context.

Methods:

This is a mixed-methods study that was conducted in two phases: The first was content validation. This phase started with two Focus Groups where experts in the field to discussed the construction and global understanding of the questionnaire. Next, still in the first phase, to verify the clarity, relevance, and coherence of the items, a Delphi methodology was used, where experts reviewed the questionnaire. The second phase was a pilot testing. It was conducted with a sample of healthcare professionals from Local Health Units to assess the instrument's internal consistency, feasibility, and preliminary reliability. After data collection, a statistical analysis of the instrument’s structure and reliability was conducted.

Results:

The final instrument includes sixty-five items across four dimensions. Content validation through a two-round Delphi process showed improved experts’ consensus between rounds, with S-CVI/Ave values increasing from 0.69-0.79-0.76 (clarity, relevance, coherence) to 0.93-0.96-0.95, respectively. Pilot testing with twenty-eight respondents demonstrated high internal consistency across all dimensions, with Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from 0.877 to 0.948. No items were removed after reliability analysis.

Conclusions:

The questionnaire presented in this study is demonstrated satisfactory content validity and feasibility for assessing digital maturity in Integrated Healthcare Systems. By supporting the assessment of digital maturity, the instrument may contribute to improvements in service delivery, operational efficiency, patient safety and overall quality of care. Further research is needed to evaluate additional psychometric properties and conrfirm its applicability in different healthcare settingsy. To the author’s knowledge, this is the first instrument designed to assess digital maturity in vertically integrated healthcare systems within a European Union context, offering a potential strategic blueprint for other Member States advancing integrated care models.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Abreu M, Magalhães T, Seringa J, Faria J, Panitz L, Vilas Boas P

Development, Content Validation, and Pilot Testing of a Digital Maturity Assessment Questionnaire for Integrated Healthcare Systems

JMIR Preprints. 30/05/2026:102781

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.102781

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/102781

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.