Currently accepted at: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: May 27, 2026
Date Accepted: Nov 2, 2026
This paper has been accepted and is currently in production.
It will appear shortly on 10.2196/102509
The final accepted version (not copyedited yet) is in this tab.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Understanding acceptability of a brief intervention for intrusive thoughts: A mixed-methods study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Intrusive thoughts (ITs) are common yet distressing experiences for many adolescents and young adults. Brief, accessible interventions that provide psychoeducation and coping strategies are needed, yet little is known about how youth perceive such interventions.
Objective:
The present study examined both qualitative and quantitative indicators of acceptability in adolescents and young adults with ITs through a digital single-session intervention (SSI) which gathered intervention feedback from participants and helped determine whether symptom improvement and/or demographic factors predicted acceptability.
Methods:
We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing our SSI to an information-only control group in individuals aged 13-25 (N=196), from a university undergraduate subject pool and the online data collection platform, CloudResearch. The analyses focus on identifying acceptability factors of the SSI condition and their associations with clinical and demographic factors by comparing means and performing regression analyses.
Results:
Thematic analyses revealed that young people with ITs prefer interventions that normalize the experience of ITs, are emotionally validating, accessible and engaging, stimulate self-reflection, and contain evidence-based strategies. Interrater agreement was high (between 88%-99%). Importantly, participants who reported qualitatively accepting the intervention were more likely to experience a reduction in hopelessness symptoms at post-intervention (t(183)=-3.45, P=.001, d=-0.47); however, acceptability was not associated with distress reduction (t(115)=-0.78, P=.44, d=-0.12). Of interest, those who identified as non-Caucasian were less likely to report they had a positive intervention experience compared to Caucasian individuals (B=0.77, SE=0.38, z=2.03, P=.04). Participants reported wanting more diverse examples of ITs to connect more with the psychoeducation, as well as more personalized examples for validation.
Conclusions:
These findings indicate acceptability factors and barriers that young adults with ITs experienced during a brief SSI and provide valuable information for the planning of future IT-related interventions. Future studies, employing more diverse examples of ITs, will be crucial for understanding further effects on acceptability and engagement.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.