Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: May 27, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 2, 2026 - Jul 28, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

How has the Oura Ring been used in research? A Scoping Review

  • Justin Jackson; 
  • In-Whi Hwang; 
  • Anel Hurtado; 
  • Eduardo E Bustamante; 
  • Lauretta T Quinn; 
  • Krista A Varady; 
  • Rrita Zejnullahi; 
  • Paul R Hibbing

ABSTRACT

Background:

Consumer-grade wearable devices play a major role in mobile health research. The Oura Ring is an emerging device with high potential for impact across multiple scientific disciplines.

Objective:

This scoping review aimed to characterize how widely the Oura Ring has been used in prior research, and from that information to identify gaps and opportunities for future investigation.

Methods:

The review followed Arksey and O’Malley’s framework for scoping reviews. Three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) were searched for studies mentioning the Oura Ring, and the resulting records were then imported to an online management platform for twofold screening (first titles and abstracts, then full-text PDFs). Remaining studies were considered eligible for inclusion in the review, prompting data extraction and quality assessment. The primary emphasis was placed on tabulation of study designs and specific Oura variables that were used across the studies.

Results:

1141 records were identified from the initial search, of which 138 were distinct studies that met the inclusion criteria. Across studies, the Oura Ring was used to assess a dozen variables, with sleep being by far the most common (76.1% of articles; n = 105) while wear time and oxygen saturation were the least used (1.4% apiece; both n = 2). Validation studies comprised 34.1% of studies (n = 47), with especially robust evidence for estimates of sleep, heart rate, and heart rate variability. Several other study designs were represented as well, notably including epidemiological studies that, in some cases, included >10,000 participants. Discussion: The findings showed widespread use of the Oura Ring in a range of settings, thus demonstrating uptake and warrant for expanded use. Opportunities for expansion include greater use in young and old age groups, as well as more research using the latest version of the device (Oura Ring 4). Stricter reporting standards are also needed, particularly around version information (device, hardware, software, algorithm, and firmware) and data retrieval procedures.

Conclusions:

The Oura Ring shows strong potential for sustained impact in research, warranting continued use and investigation.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jackson J, Hwang IW, Hurtado A, Bustamante EE, Quinn LT, Varady KA, Zejnullahi R, Hibbing PR

How has the Oura Ring been used in research? A Scoping Review

JMIR Preprints. 27/05/2026:102169

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.102169

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/102169

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.