Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: May 21, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: May 21, 2026 - Jul 16, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Evaluation of evidence quality of nurse practitioner and physician assistant postgraduate training programs for program-level outcomes: A systematic review protocol

  • Christopher Reeves; 
  • Kristina Dorsett; 
  • Nathalie Ortiz Pate; 
  • Dominick Osipowicz; 
  • Viktoriya Pleshkan; 
  • Bethany Grubb; 
  • Asefeh Faraz Covelli; 
  • Kiersten Brown; 
  • Christine Everett; 
  • Hilary Barnes

ABSTRACT

Background:

Transition to practice can be challenging for new-to-practice nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants/associates (PAs). Internationally, there has been an increase in the number of postgraduate training programs across health care settings. A scoping review found that outcomes were reported in 60% of 216 articles. However, there is no evaluation and synthesis of associated program outcomes.

Objective:

By building upon earlier work, the purpose of this systematic review is to assess the evidence quality of the literature specifically reporting on program-level outcomes for NP and PA postgraduate training programs. We will appraise the rigor of outcomes measurement, analysis, and reporting.

Methods:

This review will follow the JBI approach for systematic reviews. MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library (Wiley) Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Social Science Database (ProQuest), and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition will be searched for articles published in peer-reviewed journals since 1990 and in English. Studies on NP and PA postgraduate training programs (residencies, fellowships, onboarding) reporting program-level outcomes (job placement, turnover and retention, productivity, and costs of programs) will be included. Studies using quantitative and mixed-methods study designs will be included. Conference abstracts, editorials/opinions, dissertations/theses, reviews, and qualitative studies will be excluded. Screening, data extraction, and critical appraisal will be conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Relevant data will be extracted, and the level of rigor of each study will be established using standardized critical appraisal tools.

Results:

This review began in June 2025, and searches of databases were completed in October 2025. The title and abstract screening stage was completed December 2025. As of May 2026, we have started full text screening.

Conclusions:

Understanding the quality of outcomes reporting of post-graduate training programs for NPs and PAs will be valuable to researchers, administrators, and clinicians, as findings can inform future program development, implementation, and evaluation. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO 2025 CRD420251091013


 Citation

Please cite as:

Reeves C, Dorsett K, Ortiz Pate N, Osipowicz D, Pleshkan V, Grubb B, Faraz Covelli A, Brown K, Everett C, Barnes H

Evaluation of evidence quality of nurse practitioner and physician assistant postgraduate training programs for program-level outcomes: A systematic review protocol

JMIR Preprints. 21/05/2026:102010

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.102010

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/102010

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.