Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: May 16, 2026
Date Accepted: Aug 27, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Non-Physician Areas in Japan: Typological Classification Based on Regional Demographic Characteristics

Kuwayama T, Kotani K

Non-Physician Areas in Japan: Typological Classification Based on Regional Demographic Characteristics

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e101570

DOI: 10.2196/101570

PMID: 42854674

Typological classification of non-physician areas in Japan

  • Takashi Kuwayama; 
  • Kazuhiko Kotani

ABSTRACT

Background:

Across Japan, there are “non-physician areas” where medical institutions are not present, but medical care should be provided. These areas are considered to vary depending on the regional demographic characteristics.

Objective:

This study examined whether non-physician areas can be classified based on regional demographic characteristics using an unsupervised machine learning model.

Methods:

A total of 590 non-physician areas were seen from the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare Survey of Non-physician Areas in Japan (2019). Data on regional demographic characteristics, including population composition and automobile ownership, were also obtained. After z-score standardization, K-means clustering was used for the classification. The optimal number of clusters was determined using the silhouette values. The data on non-physician areas were divided into training (354 areas) and validation (236 areas) data. The reproducibility of the cluster structure was evaluated using Jensen–Shannon distance and chi-square tests, and a principal component analysis (PCA) was used for confirmation of the results.

Results:

The optimal number of clusters was three (silhouette=0.240), indicating that non-physician areas could be classified into three types. The cluster distributions of the training and validation data were consistent (JS distance=0.025, p=0.563), confirming the reproducibility of the cluster structure. In the PCA, non-physician areas can be interpreted along two axes: population age structure and settlement size and living infrastructure. The three clusters represented population types characterized by a relatively younger age structure, an advanced aging structure, and an intermediate structure.

Conclusions:

Three types of non-physician areas were identified using the unsupervised machine learning model in the study. These findings suggest that non-physician areas were not uniform and that the design of medical care systems might need to be adopted to regional demographic characteristics, particularly in rural areas. Clinical Trial: -


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kuwayama T, Kotani K

Non-Physician Areas in Japan: Typological Classification Based on Regional Demographic Characteristics

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e101570

DOI: 10.2196/101570

PMID: 42854674

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.