Currently submitted to: JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Date Submitted: May 29, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 2, 2026 - Jul 28, 2026
(currently open for review)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Effectiveness of Wrist-Worn Wearable–Guided Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
ABSTRACT
Background:
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide; however, participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) remains suboptimal despite its proven benefits. Although wearable devices have emerged as scalable tools for remote CR delivery, the impact of wrist-worn devices on patients’ exercise capacity and physical activity remains unclear.
Objective:
To evaluate the effectiveness of wrist-worn wearable–guided CR in patients with CVD participating in Phase II or III CR.
Methods:
Electronic databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials published between January 2015 and November 2025. Eligible studies included adults (≥18 years) with CVD who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac surgery (including coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery, or aortic surgery) and participated in Phase II–III CR using wrist-worn wearable devices in remote or hybrid programs. The primary outcomes were peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and daily steps. Secondary outcomes included body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, anaerobic threshold (AT), grip strength, and quality of life (QoL). Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and mean differences (MDs). The risk of bias was assessed at the outcome level by using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to explore potential moderators, including age, sex, intervention duration, timing of CR initiation, exercise type, feedback modality, and device type.
Results:
Eighteen randomized controlled trials were included in the systematic review, of which 16 provided sufficient data for quantitative meta-analysis. In comparison with the control interventions, wearable-based home CR significantly increased peak VO2 (SMD = 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08–0.89; P = .026) and 6MWD (SMD = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.16–0.82; P = .009). Daily steps also increased significantly (SMD = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.24–0.81; P = .005). In addition, waist circumference was significantly reduced (SMD = −0.45; 95% CI, −0.84 to −0.06; P = .038). No statistically significant effects were observed on BMI, AT, grip strength, or QoL. Subgroup analyses demonstrated greater improvements in peak VO2 when CR was initiated during Phase II compared with Phase III, and when interventions primarily consisted of aerobic exercise. Meta-regression analysis revealed a significant association between the magnitude of peak VO2 improvement and the proportion of female participants.
Conclusions:
Wrist-worn wearable–guided CR significantly enhances exercise capacity, functional walking performance, and physical activity in patients undergoing Phase II–III CR, with additional benefits in central adiposity. Early initiation and aerobics-focused training may enhance outcomes, although the risks of bias, heterogeneity, and imprecision limit the certainty of the evidence. Clinical Trial: N/A
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.