Previously submitted to: JMIR Aging (no longer under consideration since Jun 17, 2026)
Date Submitted: May 12, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: May 20, 2026 - Jun 17, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Caregiving Experiences and Support Challenges of elderly-elderly Caregivers from the Perspective of Digital Divide: A Qualitative Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Purpose To explore in depth the care experiences and support challenges faced by elderly caregivers when using smart health technologies from the perspective of the digital divide, providing a basis for developing elderly-friendly health service models. Methods Starting in 6/1/2026 and ending in 25/3/2026. A descriptive qualitative research design was employed. Using purposive sampling, 16 elderly caregivers of hospitalized elderly patients in the tertiary hospital in Guangzhou were recruited from January to March 2026 for semi-structured interviews. Directed content analysis was used to analyze the data. Results The experiences and dilemmas of older caregivers in using digital health technologies were summarized into 3 core themes and 6 sub-themes: (1) Barriers at the acquisition and access level (imbalance between physical/mental decline and technology design, lack of intergenerational family support); (2) Dilemmas at the operational and usage level (cognitive overload caused by a lack of knowledge, doubts and concerns about the effectiveness and safety of technology); (3) The divide at the cognitive and trust level (persistence and reliance on traditional caregiving methods, insufficiency of professional support systems and help-seeking channels). Conclusions This study reveals that the digital divide faced by elderly caregivers is not merely a barrier to access, but fundamentally a digital disability among the elderly, which significantly undermines the quality of care. Bridging this gap requires a three-dimensional strategy: enhancing individual digital literacy, implementing inclusive age-friendly designs, and building multi-sectoral support networks. Addressing these challenges is essential to strengthening caregiver resilience and ensuring the systemic sustainability and equity of digital health integration.
Objective:
Purpose To explore in depth the care experiences and support challenges faced by elderly caregivers when using smart health technologies from the perspective of the digital divide, providing a basis for developing elderly-friendly health service models.
Methods:
Methods Starting in 6/1/2026 and ending in 25/3/2026. A descriptive qualitative research design was employed. Using purposive sampling, 16 elderly caregivers of hospitalized elderly patients in the tertiary hospital in Guangzhou were recruited from January to March 2026 for semi-structured interviews. Directed content analysis was used to analyze the data.
Results:
Results The experiences and dilemmas of older caregivers in using digital health technologies were summarized into 3 core themes and 6 sub-themes: (1) Barriers at the acquisition and access level (imbalance between physical/mental decline and technology design, lack of intergenerational family support); (2) Dilemmas at the operational and usage level (cognitive overload caused by a lack of knowledge, doubts and concerns about the effectiveness and safety of technology); (3) The divide at the cognitive and trust level (persistence and reliance on traditional caregiving methods, insufficiency of professional support systems and help-seeking channels).
Conclusions:
Conclusions This study reveals that the digital divide faced by elderly caregivers is not merely a barrier to access, but fundamentally a digital disability among the elderly, which significantly undermines the quality of care. Bridging this gap requires a three-dimensional strategy: enhancing individual digital literacy, implementing inclusive age-friendly designs, and building multi-sectoral support networks. Addressing these challenges is essential to strengthening caregiver resilience and ensuring the systemic sustainability and equity of digital health integration. Clinical Trial: This study has undergone ethical approval: Scientific Research Ethics Committee of the General Hospital of the Southern Theater Command,17 July 2025,NZLLKZ2025064
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.