Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: May 12, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: May 14, 2026 - Jul 9, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

The Co-Tech Taxonomy: A Health CASCADE Framework for Evaluating Digital Technologies in Participatory Health Research and Co-Creation

  • Quentin Emile Armand Loisel; 
  • Danielle Marie Agnello; 
  • Qingfan An; 
  • Vinayak Anand-Kumar; 
  • George Balaskas; 
  • Homer Papadopoulos; 
  • Dimitra Pappa; 
  • Sebastien Chastin

ABSTRACT

Background:

Co-creation is increasingly used in health research, public health, and participatory initiatives to support inclusive, collaborative, and evidence-informed problem-solving. However, the integration of digital technologies into co-creation processes remains fragmented and largely ad hoc, with limited frameworks available to guide technology selection, evaluation, and development.

Objective:

This study aimed to develop the Co-Tech Taxonomy, an empirically grounded evaluative framework for assessing digital technologies used in co-creation and participatory digital health ecosystems.

Methods:

Using the Nickerson–Varshney–Muntermann (NVM) taxonomy-building method, the taxonomy was developed through the analysis of six foundational conceptual and empirical frameworks related to co-creation, participatory processes, and digital technologies. The taxonomy was subsequently refined through iterative empirical classification of 84 technologies used in co-creation contexts.

Results:

The final taxonomy consists of seven functional dimensions: governance, inclusivity, methodology, collaboration, engagement, data management, and cognitive support. Each dimension is operationalised across three progressive levels of co-creation alignment. The empirical mapping revealed that current digital ecosystems remain insufficiently aligned with participatory collaboration requirements, particularly regarding governance, inclusivity, and AI-supported cognitive facilitation. While communication and data-management functionalities were comparatively mature, participatory governance, collaborative decision-making, and AI explainability remained underdeveloped across most evaluated technologies. The taxonomy also enabled the development of a three-tier indicative certification model to support technology assessment and implementation.

Conclusions:

The Co-Tech Taxonomy provides a structured evaluative framework for assessing existing technologies, identifying implementation and innovation gaps, and guiding the development of more inclusive, transparent, interoperable, and AI-ready participatory digital infrastructures. The framework offers a practical foundation for strengthening digitally supported co-creation and participatory collaboration within health-related contexts.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Loisel QEA, Agnello DM, An Q, Anand-Kumar V, Balaskas G, Papadopoulos H, Pappa D, Chastin S

The Co-Tech Taxonomy: A Health CASCADE Framework for Evaluating Digital Technologies in Participatory Health Research and Co-Creation

JMIR Preprints. 12/05/2026:101189

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.101189

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/101189

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.