The Karma system is currently undergoing maintenance (Monday, January 29, 2018).
The maintenance period has been extended to 8PM EST.

Karma Credits will not be available for redeeming during maintenance.
Advertisement

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 7, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 7, 2018 - Mar 29, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Abstract Animations for the Communication and Assessment of Pain in Adults: Cross-Sectional Feasibility Study

Jonassaint CR, Rao N, Sciuto A, Switzer GE, De Castro L, Kato GJ, Jonassaint JC, Hammal Z, Shah N, Wasan A

Abstract Animations for the Communication and Assessment of Pain in Adults: Cross-Sectional Feasibility Study

J Med Internet Res 2018;20(8):e10056

DOI: 10.2196/10056

PMID: 30076127

PMCID: 6098242

Abstract Animations for the Communication and Assessment of Pain in Adults: Cross-Sectional Feasibility Study

  • Charles R Jonassaint; 
  • Nema Rao; 
  • Alex Sciuto; 
  • Galen E Switzer; 
  • Laura De Castro; 
  • Gregory J Kato; 
  • Jude C Jonassaint; 
  • Zakia Hammal; 
  • Nirmish Shah; 
  • Ajay Wasan

ABSTRACT

Background:

Pain is the most common physical symptom requiring medical care, yet the current methods for assessing pain are sorely inadequate. Pain assessment tools can be either too simplistic or take too long to complete to be useful for point-of-care diagnosis and treatment.

Objective:

The aim was to develop and test Painimation, a novel tool that uses graphic visualizations and animations instead of words or numeric scales to assess pain quality, intensity, and course. This study examines the utility of abstract animations as a measure of pain.

Methods:

Painimation was evaluated in a chronic pain medicine clinic. Eligible patients were receiving treatment for pain and reported pain more days than not for at least 3 months. Using a tablet computer, participating patients completed the Painimation instrument, the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and the PainDETECT questionnaire for neuropathic symptoms.

Results:

Participants (N=170) completed Painimation and indicated it was useful for describing their pain (mean 4.1, SE 0.1 out of 5 on a usefulness scale), and 130 of 162 participants (80.2%) agreed or strongly agreed that they would use Painimation to communicate with their providers. Animations selected corresponded with pain adjectives endorsed on the MPQ. Further, selection of the electrifying animation was associated with self-reported neuropathic pain (r=.16, P=.03), similar to the association between neuropathic pain and PainDETECT (r=.17, P=.03). Painimation was associated with PainDETECT (r=.35, P<.001).

Conclusions:

Using animations may be a faster and more patient-centered method for assessing pain and is not limited by age, literacy level, or language; however, more data are needed to assess the validity of this approach. To establish the validity of using abstract animations (“painimations”) for communicating and assessing pain, apps and other digital tools using painimations will need to be tested longitudinally across a larger pain population and also within specific, more homogenous pain conditions.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jonassaint CR, Rao N, Sciuto A, Switzer GE, De Castro L, Kato GJ, Jonassaint JC, Hammal Z, Shah N, Wasan A

Abstract Animations for the Communication and Assessment of Pain in Adults: Cross-Sectional Feasibility Study

JMIR Preprints. 07/02/2018:10056

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.10056

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/10056

PMID: 30076127

PMCID: 6098242

Current Preprint Settings

(as selected by the authors)
1)
Allow access to Preprints when not published (under review or accepted) for
(a) Open peer-review purposes.
(b) Logged-in Users only.
(c) Anybody, anytime.
(d) Nobody.
2)
When a final version is published in a JMIR journal
(a) Allow download.
(b) Show abstract only.
3)
Allow access to Preprints when marked as rejected or withdrawn or lapsed
(a) Logged-in Users only.
(b) Anybody, anytime.
(c) Nobody.

The preprint files are not publicly accessible.

https://www.jmir.org/2018/8/e10056

The author of this manuscript has specified that after publication, the preprint (submitted versions) should no longer be available (setting 2b). As a reader, please download and cite the published "Version of Record" instead.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.