Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)

Date Submitted: May 5, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: May 5, 2026 - Jun 30, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Research Progress on Diabetes Management Intervention Based on Functional Modules of Mobile Health (mHealth)

  • Siqi Li

ABSTRACT

Diabetes has become a significant global chronic non-communicable disease with continuously rising prevalence, imposing a heavy long-term burden on public health systems. Its management is inherently long-term and complex, relying on continuous lifestyle adjustments and treatment adherence, including blood glucose monitoring, medication, dietary control, and exercise. However, the traditional medical model, which depends mainly on regular outpatient follow-ups, struggles to provide continuous intervention in patients’ daily behaviors, limiting long-term management effectiveness. Diabetes management therefore depends heavily on patients’ daily self-management, yet studies show widespread issues of insufficient compliance and difficulty sustaining behavioral changes, leading to unsatisfactory blood sugar control. With the increasing popularity of smartphones and wearable devices, mobile health (mHealth) has emerged as an important tool for chronic disease management by offering continuous and individualized support. In diabetes care, mHealth interventions enable real-time monitoring and promote self-management improvement through data feedback, reminders, and remote support, while also breaking through time and space limitations to improve healthcare accessibility. Although previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses indicate that mHealth interventions typically reduce HbA1c by approximately 0.3% to 0.5%, significant differences in effectiveness across studies suggest that outcomes may be influenced by functional design and implementation methods. Crucially, most existing reviews classify interventions by technology type rather than by functional modules, making it difficult to reveal the specific mechanisms of action of different functions. Furthermore, the prevailing “holistic assessment” approach limits in-depth understanding of intervention mechanisms and hinders optimization of intervention design. This review therefore systematically examines mHealth diabetes management interventions from a functional module perspective to address these gaps. This review aims to systematically evaluate the progress of mHealth interventions in diabetes management through the lens of functional modules. Specifically, it seeks to: (1) construct a classification framework for mHealth diabetes management interventions based on five core functional modules—self-monitoring and data collection, feedback and reminders, provider-patient interaction, health education and behavioral support, and personalized intervention; (2) analyze the influence of different functional modules on glycemic control, self-management behaviors, and treatment adherence; (3) explore the characteristics and advantages of integrated multi-functional interventions compared to single-module approaches; and (4) provide a systematic theoretical framework and practical reference for optimizing mHealth intervention design in diabetes care. This review draws on evidence from randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews to systematically evaluate mHealth interventions in diabetes management. The study employs a functional module-based analytical approach, categorizing mHealth interventions into five core modules: self-monitoring and data collection, feedback and reminders, provider-patient interaction, health education and behavioral support, and personalized intervention. Through this lens, the review examines the mechanisms linking functional modules to behavioral change and clinical outcomes, and compares the stability and efficacy of single-module versus integrated multi-functional interventions. The findings indicate that mHealth interventions generally yield a small-to-moderate reduction in HbA1c levels, alongside consistent improvements in self-management behaviors and treatment adherence. The underlying mechanism operates through a "functional module – behavioral change – clinical outcome" pathway, rather than through the isolated impact of individual modules. Further analysis reveals that integrated multi-functional interventions offer superior stability and efficacy compared to single-module approaches, attributable to cross-module synergy and continuous behavioral reinforcement mechanisms. Despite the demonstrated benefits of mHealth interventions in diabetes management, significant challenges remain, including declining user engagement, inconsistent data quality, limited integration with traditional clinical workflows, and concerns regarding health equity and data security. Future research should prioritize mechanism-based intervention design, advance personalized and intelligent solutions, and facilitate the deep integration of mHealth within conventional healthcare systems to enhance the sustainability and clinical utility of these interventions. This review provides a systematic theoretical framework and practical reference for optimizing mHealth intervention design in diabetes care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Li S

Research Progress on Diabetes Management Intervention Based on Functional Modules of Mobile Health (mHealth)

JMIR Preprints. 05/05/2026:100169

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.100169

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/100169

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.