Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols
Date Submitted: May 2, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: May 3, 2026 - May 5, 2026
Date Accepted: Jun 26, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Empowered Relief versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and chronic pain: Protocol for a national comparative effectiveness non-inferiority trial
ABSTRACT
Background:
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) presents substantial life challenges, reflecting the complex and heterogeneous nature of the disease. Pain is common and often one of the earliest manifestations of SLE. Skills-based behavioral pain treatments are often inaccessible to patients with SLE, and no SLE-specific evidence exists to guide patient and clinician treatment choices. To fill a pressing evidence gap for SLE pain treatment, “Lupus PROGRESS” is comparing a lower-burden evidence-based behavioral pain treatment with online multi-session cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT; the gold-standard behavioral treatment for chronic pain), while also enhancing diversity and representativeness among patient advisors and the study participants.
Objective:
Lupus PROGRESS is a national, pragmatic, randomized, non-inferiority trial comparing the effectiveness of two evidence-based behavioral pain treatments, online 8-session cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT; the gold-standard behavioral treatment for chronic pain) vs. 1-session Empowered Relief in U.S. adults with SLE and chronic pain, for reducing pain intensity and pain interference at 3 months post-treatment (multi-primary endpoints).
Methods:
One hundred fifty adults with SLE and pain (≥3 months, intensity ≥3/10) will be enrolled from academic medicine, community health network, and insurance payer study sites. Participants are randomized 1:1 to either 1-session Empowered Relief (ER) or 8-session CBT, with both treatments delivered online to groups. Mixed model repeated measures and intention to treat analytic approaches will be used to test comparative effectiveness aims from baseline to 3 months post-treatment (primary endpoint). Multi-primary outcomes are change in pain intensity and pain interference; priority secondary outcomes are sleep disturbance, pain catastrophizing, pain bothersomeness and anxiety; and other secondary outcomes are satisfaction with roles and responsibilities, global impression of change, anger, fatigue and depression. Durability of effects will be tested at 6 months post-treatment. ER is hypothesized to have superior treatment completion/adherence and lower treatment burden ratings than CBT. In exploratory analyses we will compare healthcare utilization using medical record and claims data 3 months prior to enrollment to last 3 study months, hypothesizing reduced non-inferiority in reduced utilization. The study also incorporates a multi-level patient engagement infrastructure to improve accessibility, recruitment, and study relevance.
Results:
As of May 2026, we have enrolled 130 participants. Enrollment is anticipated to end September 2026, with treatments completed by February 2027, and full analyses completed by November 2027.
Conclusions:
Lupus PROGRESS will provide real-world pragmatic evidence on whether a 1-session online group skills-based treatment is non-inferior to 8-session CBT Results from this patient-centered study will inform more accessible, equitable, and patient-centered chronic pain care for people living with lupus. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT 05612750 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05612750)
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.