Currently submitted to: JMIR Perioperative Medicine
Date Submitted: May 18, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 12, 2026 - Aug 7, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Accelerometer-Captured Physical Activity Intensity and Functional Recovery Trajectories Following Major Abdominal and Pelvic Cancer Surgery
ABSTRACT
Background:
Postoperative recovery following major abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery is characterized by substantial declines in physical activity and functional capacity. Wearable accelerometers offer a novel method to objectively quantify recovery trajectories; however, data on activity intensity–specific recovery patterns and the impact of perioperative telemonitoring remain limited.
Objective:
To evaluate accelerometer-captured physical activity intensity and postoperative functional recovery trajectories, and to assess whether remote perioperative telemonitoring influences recovery following major oncologic surgery.
Methods:
This secondary analysis of a randomized comparative effectiveness trial included adult patients undergoing gastrointestinal, genitourinary, or gynecologic cancer surgery. Participants were randomized to remote perioperative telemonitoring or standard surgeon-directed care. Wrist-worn accelerometers measured light physical activity (LPA) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) from baseline through 14 days post-discharge. Patients in the remote perioperative telemonitoring arm with ≤1500 steps per day triggered an alert to nurses who initiated triage encounters. Recovery was defined as percent return to baseline activity using 5-day moving averages. Linear mixed-effects models assessed recovery trajectories over time, adjusting for demographic and surgical factors. Sensitivity analyses were performed using multiple imputation for missing accelerometer data.
Results:
Among 229 evaluable participants, patients recovered 92.7% of baseline LPA and 33.4% of baseline MVPA in the early postoperative period. Daily recovery increased by 0.5% for LPA and 2.2% for MVPA. Minimally invasive surgery was associated with significantly faster recovery for both LPA (+15.6%) and MVPA (+13.7%). Telemonitoring was not associated with statistically significant differences in overall recovery compared to standard care, although recovery rates were modestly faster in the intervention group. Sensitivity analyses using imputed data showed no significant differences in recovery by study arm or surgical approach.
Conclusions:
Postoperative recovery differs substantially by activity intensity, with rapid return of light activity but persistent deficits in moderate-to-vigorous activity. Minimally invasive surgical approaches are associated with improved recovery trajectories. While perioperative telemonitoring is feasible and well tolerated, its impact on accelerating functional recovery may be limited without targeted behavioral interventions. These findings highlight the importance of intensity-specific activity monitoring and may inform future strategies to optimize postoperative recovery in surgical oncology.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.