Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently accepted at: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Jan 27, 2026
Date Accepted: Oct 27, 2026

This paper has been accepted and is currently in production.

It will appear shortly on 10.2196/92237

The final accepted version (not copyedited yet) is in this tab.

Association Between CDSS Utilisation and Evidence-Based Nursing Practice: Cross-Sectional Multicentre Survey Study among Nurses

  • Florian Kücking; 
  • Ursula Hertha Hübner

ABSTRACT

Background:

Evidence-based nursing (EBN) is considered the gold standard in nursing care, yet the application of evidence-based guidelines remains inconsistent, despite demonstrated benefits for quality and patient safety. Barriers include limited methodological skills, time constraints, restricted access to evidence, and insufficient organisational support. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are widely debated for potentially fostering the full spectrum of EBN practice, but evidence in nursing remains heterogeneous and often focuses on isolated process indicators rather than EBN as a comprehensive construct.

Objective:

This study aims to investigate whether the degree of CDSS utilisation is positively associated with putting EBN into practice and what further factors facilitate the path from CDSS utilisation to care following EBN.

Methods:

To this end, a survey was addressed to nurses in three hospitals in Germany and Switzerland that had implemented the same commercial nursing CDSS. The survey captured items related to the dimensions of EBM, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), cognitive and academic competencies and sociodemographic covariates. To test the hypotheses on the relation between the CDSS, EBN practice and facilitating factors, a structural equation model (SEM) was estimated (n=258 participants).

Results:

The SEM revealed that the degree of utilising a CDSS was a key predictor of EBN practice, having a significant positive effect (β=0.543, p<.001). Conversely, the technology acceptance factors were a key driver of CDSS utilisation (β=0.679, p<.001). Among the competencies of nursing staff, only methodological and scientific competencies exerted a significant positive influence on EBN (β=0.444, p=.007), similar to the age of the CDSS users (β=0.365, p=.037). Overall, the model explained a high proportion of the variance in EBN (R²=.801).

Conclusions:

The findings show that digital decision support in nursing cannot only improve process adherence but also strengthen the entire spectrum of EBN practice, comprising the interaction between science and practice (knowledge), attitude and practice (trust) and science and daily work (daily practice). The findings also provide insights into what should be considered when planning to increase the acceptability of a CDSS as a vehicle to foster EBN practice. Based on the facilitating factors identified, educational measures can be tailored to build an EBN-friendly environment.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kücking F, Hübner UH

Association Between CDSS Utilisation and Evidence-Based Nursing Practice: Cross-Sectional Multicentre Survey Study among Nurses

JMIR Medical Informatics. 27/10/2026:92237 (forthcoming/in press)

DOI: 10.2196/92237

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/92237

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.