Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently accepted at: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Aug 18, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 9, 2026 - Nov 4, 2026
Date Accepted: Oct 29, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

This paper has been accepted and is currently in production.

It will appear shortly on 10.2196/109847

The final accepted version (not copyedited yet) is in this tab.

Virtual Physician Interpretation of Paramedic-Acquired Point-of-Care Ultrasound Across Device Modalities: A Mixed Methods Usability Pilot

  • Eryn Libert-Scott; 
  • Marissa Stambene; 
  • Amanda L Chen; 
  • Steve Reid; 
  • Suean Pascoe; 
  • Shane Virani; 
  • Ghazwan Altabbaa; 
  • John Conly; 
  • Michelle Nora Grinman

ABSTRACT

Background:

Despite its established clinical value, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use remains limited by access to expertise and challenges with workflow integration. Remote interpretation, enabled by cloud-based platforms, has the potential to address these challenges by enhancing accessibility.

Objective:

To conduct a small exploratory pilot study to assess the usability and observed agreement of remote interpretation of lung and inferior vena cava (IVC) POCUS across device types for lung and inferior vena cava (IVC) ultrasound scans leveraging Presuna’s teleultrasound software.

Methods:

Four clinical vignettes with associated lung and IVC ultrasound scans were reviewed by four physicians using Presuna across three device modalities (laptop, tablet, smartphone) over three separate sessions. We calculated inter-rater observed agreement between participants and the reference standard, as well as System Usability Scale (SUS) scores via surveys. Thematic analysis was conducted from observations and participant interviews to gain insight into the overall user experience.

Results:

Observed agreement results revealed that the laptop (lung = 83%, IVC = 75%, clinical impression (CI) =78%) had slightly higher agreement than the tablet (lung = 80%, IVC = 74%, CI=77%) and smartphone (lung = 81%, IVC = 73, CI=78%). Participants found Presuna appealing, particularly for its remote asynchronous capabilities. The laptop version of the platform was favored over tablet and smartphone versions, with SUS scores of 76.5, 55.0, and 59.5 respectively. However, participants emphasized the unique portability advantages of handheld devices, which would be particularly convenient for physicians working remotely and during non-workday hours. Of note, the requirement to record participant sessions caused excessive performance lag for the tablet which led to incomplete responses by one participant and likely impacted the SUS results.

Conclusions:

To support the successful design of more usable remote POCUS interpretation software, it is essential to consider language clarity, interface design, and pre-implementation training.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Libert-Scott E, Stambene M, Chen AL, Reid S, Pascoe S, Virani S, Altabbaa G, Conly J, Grinman MN

Virtual Physician Interpretation of Paramedic-Acquired Point-of-Care Ultrasound Across Device Modalities: A Mixed Methods Usability Pilot

JMIR Human Factors. 29/10/2026:109847 (forthcoming/in press)

DOI: 10.2196/109847

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/109847

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.