JMIR Publications

ABSTRACT

Background:

Mentoring is a key strategy in capacity building for implementation science (IS). The success of mentor-mentee relationships is associated with complex relational and structural challenges, yet few programmes have explored mentoring mechanisms outside of Western contexts. The Centre of Behavioural and Implementation Science Interventions (BISI), a centre to drive IS research in Singapore, launched the Seed Grant program that paired early-career clinician scientists with experienced mentors to support small-scale IS research projects.

Objective:

This study is a formative evaluation of the program and aims to i) explore participants’ experiences and needs of the mentoring process; ii) the extent to which intended deliverables were achieved; and iii) participants’ views regarding future development of the program.

Methods:

We conducted a multi-method qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and document review. All individuals involved in the program (n=10) participated in interviews, including mentors, mentees, program managers, and mentees' research staff. We triangulated interview findings against materials documenting the program development and mentoring process. Thematic analysis was performed inductively and supported by reflexive member checking.

Results:

Three overarching themes emerged: (1) factors influencing project progress and mentoring relationships (e.g. logistical challenges, readiness for IS research, role clarity); (2) participants’ expectations and perceived program outcomes (e.g. mentees' skill development, IS network growth, research outputs); and (3) attitudes toward future iterations. While participants valued the training and peer learning opportunities, challenges included short timelines, limited resources, and unclear mentoring expectations.

Conclusions:

Findings highlight the structural, interpersonal, and contextual complexities of IS mentoring. Programs must balance structure and flexibility, ensure role clarity, and provide adequate resources. This study contributes to the design of IS mentoring programs in Southeast Asian contexts and informs future capacity-building efforts.