Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Jan 26, 2018
Date Accepted: May 7, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Development of a Tailored Intervention With Computerized Clinical Decision Support to Improve Quality of Care for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Multi-Method Study

Van de Velde S, Kortteisto T, Spitaels D, Jamtvedt G, Roshanov P, Kunnamo I, Aertgeerts B, Vandvik PO, Flottorp S

Development of a Tailored Intervention With Computerized Clinical Decision Support to Improve Quality of Care for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Multi-Method Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2018;7(6):e154

DOI: 10.2196/resprot.9927

PMID: 29891466

PMCID: 6018233

Development of a Tailored Intervention With Computerized Clinical Decision Support to Improve Quality of Care for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Multi-Method Study

  • Stijn Van de Velde; 
  • Tiina Kortteisto; 
  • David Spitaels; 
  • Gro Jamtvedt; 
  • Pavel Roshanov; 
  • Ilkka Kunnamo; 
  • Bert Aertgeerts; 
  • Per Olav Vandvik; 
  • Signe Flottorp

ABSTRACT

Background:

Clinical practice patterns greatly diverge from evidence-based recommendations to manage knee osteoarthritis conservatively before resorting to surgery.

Objective:

This study aimed to tailor a guideline-based computerized decision support (CDS) intervention that facilitates the conservative management of knee osteoarthritis.

Methods:

Experts with backgrounds in clinical medicine, research, implementation, or health informatics suggested the most important recommendations for implementation, how to develop an implementation strategy, and how to form the CDS algorithms. In 6 focus group sessions, 8 general practitioners and 22 patients from Norway, Belgium, and Finland discussed the suggested CDS intervention and identified factors that would be most critical for the success of the intervention. The focus group moderators used the GUideline Implementation with DEcision Support checklist, which we developed to support consideration of CDS success factors.

Results:

The experts prioritized 9 out of 22 recommendations for implementation. We formed the concept for 6 CDS algorithms to support implementation of these recommendations. The focus group suggested 59 unique factors that could affect the success of the presented CDS intervention. Five factors (out of the 59) were prioritized by focus group participants in every country, including the perceived potential to address the information needs of both patients and general practitioners; the credibility of CDS information; the timing of CDS for patients; and the need for personal dialogue about CDS between the general practitioner and the patient.

Conclusions:

The focus group participants supported the CDS intervention as a tool to improve the quality of care for patients with knee osteoarthritis through shared, evidence-based decision making. We aim to develop and implement the CDS based on these study results. Future research should address optimal ways to (1) provide patient-directed CDS, (2) enable more patient-specific CDS within the context of patient complexity, and (3) maintain user engagement with CDS over time.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Van de Velde S, Kortteisto T, Spitaels D, Jamtvedt G, Roshanov P, Kunnamo I, Aertgeerts B, Vandvik PO, Flottorp S

Development of a Tailored Intervention With Computerized Clinical Decision Support to Improve Quality of Care for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Multi-Method Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2018;7(6):e154

DOI: 10.2196/resprot.9927

PMID: 29891466

PMCID: 6018233

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.