Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Apr 11, 2026
Date Accepted: Sep 14, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Neoadjuvant Apalutamide With or Without Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Prior to Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Protocol for a Randomized Phase 2 Trial

Zhang AY, Stein MN, Ghodoussipour SB, Kim IY

Neoadjuvant Apalutamide With or Without Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Prior to Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Protocol for a Randomized Phase 2 Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2026;15:e97886

DOI: 10.2196/97886

PMID: 42976301

Protocol: Randomized Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Apalutamide with or without Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone and GnRH Agonist Prior to Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer

  • Anthony Y. Zhang; 
  • Mark N. Stein; 
  • Saum B. Ghodoussipour; 
  • Isaac Y. Kim

ABSTRACT

Background:

Androgen receptor-targeted therapy has been proposed to improve survival in patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa). However, the impact of androgen receptor blockade on localized disease remains largely unknown.

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant apalutamide with or without abiraterone acetate plus prednisone, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist on the feasibility of performing nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (RP) in men with high-risk localized PCa.

Methods:

This is a prospective, multicenter randomized phase II clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02949284). Eligible patients with high-risk PCa were randomized 1:1:1 to (1) apalutamide monotherapy for 3 months followed by RP, (2) apalutamide with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone, and GnRH agonist for 3 months followed by RP, or (3) immediate RP without neoadjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint is recovery of erectile function at 12 months postoperatively. Secondary endpoints include urinary continence recovery, pathological outcomes, biochemical recurrence, and quality-of-life measures.

Results:

As of March 2026, patient enrollment has been completed. A total of 96 patients were consented and screened, 88 randomized, and 73 received assigned treatment and were included within the final analysis cohort. Data collection for primary and secondary outcomes has been completed, with final analysis anticipated in 2026.

Conclusions:

This trial will provide prospective evidence regarding the role of neoadjuvant androgen receptor-targeted therapy in improving functional and oncologic outcomes in men undergoing RP for high-risk localized PCa. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02949284; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02949284


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zhang AY, Stein MN, Ghodoussipour SB, Kim IY

Neoadjuvant Apalutamide With or Without Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Prior to Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Protocol for a Randomized Phase 2 Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2026;15:e97886

DOI: 10.2196/97886

PMID: 42976301

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.