Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Apr 2, 2026
Date Accepted: Jul 20, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Prevalence and Determinants of Blood Exposure Accidents Among Health Care Workers in Kalemie, Democratic Republic of the Congo: Cross-Sectional Study

Kabamba Dibwe J, Ilunga Mbayo F, Mukalay Muvumbu P, Kasongo Lupitshi G, Banze Kabwe Ilunga JC, Sashila Mukebo D, Mukendi Mpunga D

Prevalence and Determinants of Blood Exposure Accidents Among Health Care Workers in Kalemie, Democratic Republic of the Congo: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2026;12:e97009

DOI: 10.2196/97009

Prevalence and Determinants of Blood Exposure Accidents Among Healthcare Workers in Kalemie, Democratic Republic of the Congo: Cross-Sectional Study

  • Joe Kabamba Dibwe; 
  • Fiston Ilunga Mbayo; 
  • Papy Mukalay Muvumbu; 
  • Gloire Kasongo Lupitshi; 
  • Jean Claude Banze Kabwe Ilunga; 
  • Didier Sashila Mukebo; 
  • Dieudonné Mukendi Mpunga

ABSTRACT

Background:

Blood exposure accidents (BEAs) remain a major occupational hazard for healthcare providers, particularly in low‑resource settings. Despite their preventable nature, BEAs continue to occur frequently due to gaps in compliance with standard precautions and limited institutional surveillance.

Objective:

This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with BEAs among healthcare providers in Kalemie, Tanganyika Province, Democratic Republic of Congo.

Methods:

A cross‑sectional study was conducted in March 2024 among 316 healthcare providers randomly selected from 34 health facilities (20 public, 9 private, 5 faith‑based). Data were collected using a structured questionnaire adapted from WHO and CDC tools. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of BEAs, with adjusted odds ratios (AOR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and p‑values reported.

Results:

The lifetime prevalence of BEAs was 64.8% (208/316), and the 12‑month prevalence was 60.4% (191/316). The most frequent causes were unexpected patient movement (42.4%) and lack of attention (34.6%). Needle‑stick injuries accounted for 59.2% of exposures. Only 36.1% of incidents were formally reported. Multivariate analysis identified two independent predictors: - Non‑compliance with standard precautions (AOR = 2.92; 95% CI: 1.50–5.68; p = 0.001). - Facility type: working in secondary‑level facilities was protective (AOR = 0.31; 95% CI: 0.14–0.67; p = 0.003).

Conclusions:

BEAs are highly prevalent among healthcare providers in Kalemie. Most incidents are preventable, and non‑compliance with standard precautions significantly increases risk. Strengthening infection prevention and control measures, ensuring consistent availability of personal protective equipment, and establishing effective surveillance systems are urgently needed to protect healthcare workers and reinforce health system resilience.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kabamba Dibwe J, Ilunga Mbayo F, Mukalay Muvumbu P, Kasongo Lupitshi G, Banze Kabwe Ilunga JC, Sashila Mukebo D, Mukendi Mpunga D

Prevalence and Determinants of Blood Exposure Accidents Among Health Care Workers in Kalemie, Democratic Republic of the Congo: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2026;12:e97009

DOI: 10.2196/97009

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.