Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Mar 15, 2026
Date Accepted: Aug 21, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patient-Provider Distance in Medicare Outpatient Oncology Telehealth Versus Office Visits, 2021‐2023: Cross-Sectional Claims Analysis

Liu L, Onega T, Moen EL, Tosteson ANA, Smith RE, Wang Q, Cowan L, Wang F

Patient-Provider Distance in Medicare Outpatient Oncology Telehealth Versus Office Visits, 2021‐2023: Cross-Sectional Claims Analysis

JMIR Med Inform 2026;14:e95370

DOI: 10.2196/95370

PMID: 42913396

Patient-Provider Distance in Medicare Outpatient Oncology Telehealth Versus Office Visits, 2021–2023: Cross-Sectional Claims Analysis

  • Lingbo Liu; 
  • Tracy Onega; 
  • Erika L. Moen; 
  • Anna N. A. Tosteson; 
  • Rebecca E. Smith; 
  • Qianfei Wang; 
  • Lauren Cowan; 
  • Fahui Wang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Telehealth has been widely promoted as a way to reduce travel burden for patients with cancer, particularly after the rapid expansion of virtual care following the COVID-19 public health emergency. However, national evidence remains limited on whether telehealth meaningfully broadens the geographic reach of outpatient oncology care or reduces persistent rural-urban disparities.

Objective:

To quantify whether telehealth expands the geographic reach of outpatient oncology care in the United States and whether expansion differs by rurality and region.

Methods:

In a cross-sectional analysis of Medicare Fee-For-Service outpatient oncology-related encounters (2021-2023) in the CMS Virtual Research Data Center, we calculated great-circle distance between beneficiary residential ZIP centroids and provider practice ZIP centroids for telehealth and office visits. We summarized distances by rural-urban commuting area (RUCA) strata and U.S. Census region using medians/IQRs and cumulative distributions; d80 is the distance containing 80% of visits within each RUCA stratum.

Results:

Among 858,813 beneficiaries and 16,669,868 visits, 40.9% had at least 1 telehealth visit; telehealth accounted for 6.6% of encounters. Distances increased with rurality. Telehealth closely tracked office visits, with modest upper-tail expansion; d80 was 8-14 miles higher for telehealth (urban: 130.4 vs 116.0 miles). Across regions, telehealth medians were 0.8-3.6 miles higher than office visits.

Conclusions:

Telehealth extends reach for a minority of oncology encounters but largely operates within local catchments and preserves rural-urban distance gradients. Equitable travel relief may require broadband affordability, digital navigation supports, and cross-state licensure reciprocity.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Liu L, Onega T, Moen EL, Tosteson ANA, Smith RE, Wang Q, Cowan L, Wang F

Patient-Provider Distance in Medicare Outpatient Oncology Telehealth Versus Office Visits, 2021‐2023: Cross-Sectional Claims Analysis

JMIR Med Inform 2026;14:e95370

DOI: 10.2196/95370

PMID: 42913396

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.