Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting

Date Submitted: Nov 29, 2017
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 29, 2017 - Jun 15, 2018
Date Accepted: Jun 15, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Engaging Men in Prenatal Health via eHealth: Findings From a National Survey

Mackert M, Guadagno M, Lazard A, Donovan E, Rochlen A, Garcia A, Damásio MJ, Crook B

Engaging Men in Prenatal Health via eHealth: Findings From a National Survey

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2018;1(2):e7

DOI: 10.2196/pediatrics.9513

PMID: 31518311

PMCID: 6715069

Engaging Men in Prenatal Health via eHealth: Findings From a National Survey

  • Michael Mackert; 
  • Marie Guadagno; 
  • Allison Lazard; 
  • Erin Donovan; 
  • Aaron Rochlen; 
  • Alexandra Garcia; 
  • Manuel José Damásio; 
  • Brittani Crook

ABSTRACT

Background:

Pregnancy outcomes in the United States rank among the worst of countries with a developed health care system. Although traditional prenatal health primarily focuses on women, promising findings have emerged in international research that suggest the potential of including men in prenatal health interventions in the United States. eHealth apps present a promising avenue to reach new and expectant fathers with crucial parenting knowledge and healthy, supportive behaviors.

Objective:

The aim was to explore the perceived role of men in prenatal health, acceptability of eHealth to positively engage men during pregnancy, and participant-suggested ways of improving a prenatal health app designed for new and expectant fathers.

Methods:

A nationally representative sample of adult males (N=962) was recruited through an online survey panel. A third-party market research and digital data collection agency managed the recruitment. The sample had a mean age of 30.2 (SD 6.3) years and included both fathers (413/962, 42.9%) and non-fathers (549/962, 57.1%). Nearly 12.0% (115/962) of participants had a partner who was pregnant at the time of the survey.

Results:

Despite perceived barriers, such as time constraints, financial burdens, and an unclear role, men believe it is important to be involved in pregnancy health. The majority of participants (770/944, 81.6%) found the site to contain useful and interesting information. Most substantially, more than three-quarters (738/962, 76.7%) of the sample said they would share the site with others who would benefit from the information. Participants recommended the addition of interactive modules, such as a financial planning tool and videos, to make the site stronger.

Conclusions:

We explored the use of targeted eHealth to introduce men to prenatal education. Results indicate men are favorable to this intervention. Additional refinement should include interactive tools to further engage men in this important issue. Reaching men at the prenatal phase is an early “teachable moment”—where new/expectant fathers are open to information on how to help their partners have a healthy pregnancy and promote the health of their unborn children. Findings will further inform best practices for engaging men in pregnancy, which is crucial for improving maternal and child health outcomes in the United States.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mackert M, Guadagno M, Lazard A, Donovan E, Rochlen A, Garcia A, Damásio MJ, Crook B

Engaging Men in Prenatal Health via eHealth: Findings From a National Survey

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2018;1(2):e7

DOI: 10.2196/pediatrics.9513

PMID: 31518311

PMCID: 6715069

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.