Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Nursing

Date Submitted: Mar 6, 2026
Date Accepted: Aug 20, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Natural Language Processing in Nursing Practice for Clinical Reasoning and Workflow: Scoping Review

Iwase K, Teshima T, Yamakawa M, Takeya Y

Natural Language Processing in Nursing Practice for Clinical Reasoning and Workflow: Scoping Review

JMIR Nursing 2026;9:e94778

DOI: 10.2196/94778

Natural Language Processing in Nursing Practice for Clinical Reasoning and Workflow: Scoping Review

  • Keisuke Iwase; 
  • Taiki Teshima; 
  • Miyae Yamakawa; 
  • Yasushi Takeya

ABSTRACT

Background:

Recent advancements in digital health technologies have led to the accumulation of large volumes of unstructured text data, particularly in electronic health records. Because nursing documentation frequently includes detailed descriptions of daily living activities and psychosocial contexts, existing medical natural language processing (NLP) tools are not directly applicable. Moreover, the integration of standardized nursing terminologies into NLP systems remains limited. Although NLP can potentially support patient safety, risk detection, and care planning, its practical uses in nursing have not been systematically mapped.

Objective:

This scoping review aimed to map practical applications of NLP in nursing—particularly in assessment, documentation, and interventions—and to identify study characteristics, application domains, outcomes, and challenges.

Methods:

Following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and Ichushi-Web in October 2023 and June 2025. The PCC framework (Population: nurses, Concept: NLP applications, Context: clinical settings) was used for study selection. Two independent reviewers screened 2,889 unique records and performed a full-text review of 72 articles. Data were descriptively synthesized and thematically classified.

Results:

Six studies met the rigorous inclusion criteria, reflecting the nascent stage of the field. NLP applications were categorized into (1) text summarization and generation, (2) information extraction and classification, and (3) real-time detection and screening. NLP was applied across multiple nursing practice stages, including handovers, assessment, care planning, continuity of care, and patient safety management. Notably, NLP did not function as a direct substitute for nurses’ decision-making; rather, it served as an augmented intelligence that complemented nurses’ clinical judgment and supported appropriate nursing interventions.

Conclusions:

Within nursing, NLP may reduce the burden of documentation, support early risk detection, and facilitate individualized care planning. By complementing nurses’ clinical reasoning, NLP may contribute to improved patient safety and quality of care. Future research should focus on real-world clinical implementation and empirically evaluate NLP’s impact on nursing workflows and decision-making processes.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Iwase K, Teshima T, Yamakawa M, Takeya Y

Natural Language Processing in Nursing Practice for Clinical Reasoning and Workflow: Scoping Review

JMIR Nursing 2026;9:e94778

DOI: 10.2196/94778

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.