Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Feb 12, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 12, 2026 - Apr 9, 2026
Date Accepted: Jul 29, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Study of High-Velocity Nasal Insufflation vs Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation for Emergency Type 2 Respiratory Failure: Protocol for a Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

Chua MT, Pan DST, Ng AJY, Soh CHW, Kuan WS

Study of High-Velocity Nasal Insufflation vs Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation for Emergency Type 2 Respiratory Failure: Protocol for a Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2026;15:e93391

DOI: 10.2196/93391

PMID: 42600161

Study of High-velocity nasal Insufflation versus Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for Emergency type 2 respiratory failure (SHINE): Protocol for a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

  • Mui Teng Chua; 
  • Darius Shaw Teng Pan; 
  • Alexander Jet Yue Ng; 
  • Crystal Harn Wei Soh; 
  • Win Sen Kuan

ABSTRACT

Background:

Type 2 respiratory failure (T2RF) is a common and high-risk presentation in the emergency department (ED). Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is a standard first-line therapy for T2RF, particularly in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiogenic pulmonary edema. However, NIPPV has limitations including discomfort, claustrophobia, air leaks, skin injury, and aspiration, which may compromise tolerance and lead to treatment failure or escalation to endotracheal intubation. High-velocity nasal insufflation (HVNI), particularly via a single-prong asymmetric cannula configuration, has been proposed to enhance dead-space washout and improve patient comfort. Despite growing interest, robust evidence evaluating HVNI in heterogeneous, all-cause T2RF populations in the ED remains limited.

Objective:

This study aims to determine whether HVNI delivered via a single-prong nasal cannula is non-inferior to standard NIPPV in improving ventilation among adult ED patients with T2RF from any cause.

Methods:

This is a single-center, open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial conducted in the ED of a tertiary academic center. Adults 21 years and above with T2RF defined as PaCO2 >45 mmHg and pH <7.35, requiring ventilatory support, will be randomized 1:1 to HVNI with single-prong cannula or standard NIPPV. Allocation will be concealed via an independent web-based platform using variable block sizes (4 and 6). The primary outcome is percentage change in PaCO2 from baseline to 60 minutes after initiation of therapy. Eighty-four patients provide 80% power, one-sided alpha 2.5% assuming standard deviation 6.65% and non-inferiority margin 4.3%. Analyses will use intention-to-treat and per-protocol approaches, and sensitivity analyses to address missing arterial blood gas results. Predefined failure criteria (persistent or worsening acidosis, rising PaCO2, refractory hypoxemia, severe intolerance, clinical deterioration) would trigger crossover or escalation per protocol.

Results:

Ethics approval was granted by the local institutional ethics board on 24 February 2025 (reference: 2024-4329). Recruitment commenced in January 2026 and is expected to be completed by June 2027. As of July 2026, 19 participants have been enrolled out of a target sample of 84.

Conclusions:

Should HVNI with single-prong cannula be shown to be non-inferior to NIPPV, it may offer a practical alternative to treatment of T2RF in the ED when mask-based interfaces are poorly tolerated or contraindicated, potentially reducing the need for more invasive interventions like endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Clinical Trial: This trial was prospectively registered on 15 July 2025 with ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT07065656).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Chua MT, Pan DST, Ng AJY, Soh CHW, Kuan WS

Study of High-Velocity Nasal Insufflation vs Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation for Emergency Type 2 Respiratory Failure: Protocol for a Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2026;15:e93391

DOI: 10.2196/93391

PMID: 42600161

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.