Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Feb 7, 2026
Date Accepted: Sep 22, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Gaps Between Self-Reported and Documented Use of a Health Care Service Portal Among Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Survey and Retrospective Electronic Data Study

Neter E, Levin-Zamir D, Eliyahu E, Chang PW, Duong TV, Baron-Epel O

Gaps Between Self-Reported and Documented Use of a Health Care Service Portal Among Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Survey and Retrospective Electronic Data Study

JMIR Aging 2026;9:e93057

DOI: 10.2196/93057

PMID: 42868591

Gaps between self-reported and documented use of a healthcare service portal among older adults; a cross-sectional survey and retrospective electronic data study

  • Efrat Neter; 
  • Diane Levin-Zamir; 
  • Ester Eliyahu; 
  • Peter WS Chang; 
  • Tuyen V. Duong; 
  • Orna Baron-Epel

ABSTRACT

Background:

Healthcare systems increasingly offer citizens services through online portals, which have been found to be associated with patient satisfaction and better management of health concerns. Few studies compared reported use to actual use of portals, especially among older adults.

Objective:

Examine differences between actual and self-reported health portal usage, and their association with background variables and digital health literacy among older adults.

Methods:

A cross- sectional telephone survey was conducted among 600 participants aged 60+ who were sampled from a registry of members of a national health maintenance organization (HMO). The participants reported their usage of the HMO’s portal, their digital health literacy (DHL), demographic and background variables. Participants’ actual usage of the portal was retrospectively retrieved from the HMO’s database.

Results:

A large gap between self-reported use and actual use of the health portal was found: for example, while only 8.1% reported not using the portal, HMO’s records indicated 62.0% did not make use of the portal; still, a positive correlation was found between self-reported usage and actual usage (r=.22, P <0.001). Significant strong associations were found between administrative and physician-related online activities, both reported (r=.41, P <0.001) and actual (r=.56, P <0.001). A multivariate analysis where actual use was the dependent variable explained 12.6% of the variance. Age (β=-.09, P=0.038), experience with computers (β=.14, P=0.019), and ethnicity β=-.22, P<0.001) were significantly associated with actual use. DHL, though significantly associated with actual use at bi-variate level (r=.09, P=042), was not significantly associated with actual use in this analysis (β=.02, P=0.999).

Conclusions:

The findings indicate that users tend to overestimate their health portal usage, possibly reflecting social desirability regarding digital functioning or a perception that assisted use is also usage. Future studies on digital health use should also include measures of actual use. Clinical Trial: not a trial


 Citation

Please cite as:

Neter E, Levin-Zamir D, Eliyahu E, Chang PW, Duong TV, Baron-Epel O

Gaps Between Self-Reported and Documented Use of a Health Care Service Portal Among Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Survey and Retrospective Electronic Data Study

JMIR Aging 2026;9:e93057

DOI: 10.2196/93057

PMID: 42868591

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.