Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Date Submitted: Oct 19, 2017
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 21, 2017 - Jun 21, 2018
Date Accepted: Jun 21, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Adoption of Stroke Rehabilitation Technologies by the User Community: Qualitative Study

Kerr A, Smith M, Reid L, Baillie L

Adoption of Stroke Rehabilitation Technologies by the User Community: Qualitative Study

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2018;5(2):e15

DOI: 10.2196/rehab.9219

PMID: 30120086

PMCID: 6119213

Adoption of Stroke Rehabilitation Technologies by the User Community: Qualitative Study

  • Andrew Kerr; 
  • Mark Smith; 
  • Lynn Reid; 
  • Lynne Baillie

ABSTRACT

Background:

Using technology in stroke rehabilitation is attractive. Devices such as robots or smartphones can help deliver evidence-based levels of practice intensity and automated feedback without additional labor costs. Currently, however, few technologies have been adopted into everyday rehabilitation.

Objective:

This project aimed to identify stakeholder (therapists, patients, and caregivers) priorities for stroke rehabilitation technologies and to generate user-centered solutions for enhancing everyday adoption.

Methods:

We invited stakeholders (n=60), comprising stroke survivors (20/60, 33%), therapists (20/60, 33%), caregivers, and technology developers (including researchers; 20/60, 33%), to attend 2 facilitated workshops. Workshop 1 was preceded by a national survey of stroke survivors and therapists (n=177) to generate an initial list of priorities. The subsequent workshop focused on identifying practical solutions to enhance adoption.

Results:

A total of 25 priorities were generated from the survey; these were reduced to 10 nonranked priorities through discussion, consensus activities, and voting at Workshop 1: access to technologies, ease of use, awareness of available technologies, technologies focused on function, supports self-management, user training, evidence of effectiveness, value for money, knowledgeable staff, and performance feedback. The second workshop provided recommendations for improving the adoption of technologies in stroke rehabilitation: an annual exhibition of commercially available and developing technologies, an online consumer-rating website of available technologies, and a user network to inspire and test new technologies.

Conclusions:

The key outcomes from this series of stakeholder workshops provides a starting point for an integrated approach to promoting greater adoption of technologies in stroke rehabilitation. Bringing technology developers and users together to shape future and evaluate current technologies is critical to achieving evidence-based stroke rehabilitation.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kerr A, Smith M, Reid L, Baillie L

Adoption of Stroke Rehabilitation Technologies by the User Community: Qualitative Study

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2018;5(2):e15

DOI: 10.2196/rehab.9219

PMID: 30120086

PMCID: 6119213

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.