Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Jan 21, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 22, 2026 - Mar 19, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Intercostal cryoanalgesia versus thoracic epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control after thoracic surgery: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial

  • André Miotto; 
  • Juliana P. Franceschini; 
  • Maria Luiza de Paula Pereira; 
  • Isabella Correia da Rocha; 
  • Maria Luiza Campos Ferreira; 
  • Suéllen Battaglini Rolando; 
  • Ernesto Evangelista Neto; 
  • João Aléssio Juliano Perfeito

ABSTRACT

Background:

Post thoracotomy pain remains a major clinical challenge, with substantial impact on pulmonary function, postoperative recovery, and patient quality of life. Thoracic epidural analgesia is widely regarded as the standard of care; however, it is associated with potential complications, including hypotension, urinary retention, and inadequate analgesia in a subset of patients. Intercostal cryoanalgesia, a peripheral nerve block technique that induces temporary axonal degeneration through controlled freezing, has emerged as a potential alternative for prolonged postoperative pain control.

Objective:

The primary objective of this study is to compare postoperative hospital length of stay between intercostal cryoanalgesia and thoracic epidural analgesia. Secondary objectives include the evaluation of postoperative pain intensity, opioid consumption, adverse effects, postoperative complications, quality of life, quality of recovery, and patient satisfaction.

Methods:

This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial comparing intercostal cryoanalgesia with thoracic epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Fifty adult patients (≥18 years) are randomized 1:1 to either epidural or cryoanalgesia groups. All perioperative and postoperative care is provided by the attending clinical teams according to routine institutional practice, with no influence from the research team beyond randomized allocation. The primary endpoint is postoperative hospital length of stay. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity (visual analogue scale), opioid consumption, incidence of adverse effects and complications, quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF), and quality of recovery (QoR-15). Data are collected up to 1 year postoperatively.

Results:

Approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee was obtained in November 2024, and participant recruitment began in July 2025. Data collection commenced in September 2026 and is expected to be completed by August 28, 2027. Data analysis will begin in September 2027, with results anticipated in the first quarter of 2028.

Conclusions:

This study protocol outlines a randomized clinical trial designed to assess clinical outcomes associated with intercostal cryoanalgesia compared with thoracic epidural analgesia following thoracic surgery. The findings are expected to contribute to the evidence base on postoperative pain management and inform the design of future comparative and implementation studies in this field. Clinical Trial: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC): identifier RBR-78zfpxd.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Miotto A, Franceschini JP, Pereira MLdP, da Rocha IC, Ferreira MLC, Rolando SB, Evangelista Neto E, Perfeito JAJ

Intercostal cryoanalgesia versus thoracic epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control after thoracic surgery: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial

JMIR Preprints. 21/01/2026:91837

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.91837

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/91837

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.